RE: YoY down4 Jan 2025 09:19
Happy New Year Dab!
And good luck for 2025. (I won't say 'break a leg' ...)
So NWT ended 2024 at 70p: i.e. 6.67% down on the year, from 75p.
A disappointing s.p. performance, though actually broadly in line with AIM as a whole:-
FTSE AIM All-Share (AXX) Index in 2024: -5.72% (from 763.32 to 719.63)
https://www.londonstockexchange.com/indices/ftse-aim-all-share
NWT's long-standing public listing must help its credibility in winning new business, in 'sensitive' sectors, and overseas.
But Grosvenor Technology would undoubtedly command a much higher valuation if it was spun-out in a US floatation.
That said, NWT's numbers are now starting to do the talking, and a doubled or trebled s.p. here is quite possible with the right news regardless.
"Has AIM now become an irrelevance? Scores of defectors think so
Last updated: 10:44 31 Dec 2024 GMT, First published: 10:43 31 Dec 2024 GMT
Written by: Ian Lyall
As the curtain falls on the year, the exodus from the UK market shows no signs of abating, underscoring deep structural issues that plague the nation’s public markets.
... According to data from accountancy firm UHY Hacker Young, 92 companies exited AIM (Alternative Investment Market) in the year to October, reducing the junior bourse’s membership to fewer than 700 for the first time since 2001.
AIM, once celebrated as a vibrant marketplace for growth companies, has been hobbled by long-standing challenges, including high costs and onerous bureaucracy.
Listing on AIM typically entails initial costs of around £500,000, with annual expenses for regulatory filings, legal fees, and associated costs adding another £200,000. For smaller firms, these figures are prohibitive and increasingly untenable.
Liquidity issues
Compounding the issue of diminished liquidity. Investor preferences have shifted towards passive funds that track major indices, leaving riskier small-cap stocks starved of attention and capital.
For a market that has historically supported the entrepreneurial ecosystem — raising nearly £135 billion for some 4,000 companies since its inception in 1995 — this loss of focus is existential.
AIM is no longer fulfilling its primary role: providing growth capital to ambitious entrepreneurs.
The repercussions are clear. Instead of listing on AIM, a tech-savvy CEO with a promising start-up is likely to court private capital, where funds are abundant, valuations are attractive, and red tape is minimal.
Too little, too late?
For those seeking a liquidity event, the US market offers a far more compelling proposition — deeper liquidity pools, more patient investors, and higher valuations. ..."
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1063533/has-aim-now-become-an-irrelevance-scores-of-defectors-think-so-1063533.html