Member Info for Havoc3852

I work for a company that provides life insurance to companies for their employees as part of their benefit packages so an area i actually have a bit of understanding. Any benefits that are paid out in excess of the life time allowance, which i believe has just increased to 1,000,550, is taxed at 55%. So id imagine we would be going after high valued polices insured which are paid out by the individual as they would have had the set up seperately under an excepted trust which avoids the taxation.

For me RKB lost all credibility when he got banned from posting on the CLP board and was making out it was people involved with BOU and was very vocal about it on Twitter which amounted to nothing and CLP is still languishing around 50% down after he posted he "knew" upcoming news was going to be good.

There could be an element of truth in his claims. However the big red flag for which is causing me to question his motives is why he waited some many weeks before making his announcement...

Andy - I was that were the case but I am looking at twitter and the post is very much still there.

But he knows people still watch and listen to him so any statements he makes people do listen to no matter what disclaimers he has. I saw someone post on another LSE board that he said he knew that people read his posts and people do act upon them. he subsequently got banned for a short time and posted rarely after that.

The only way I think we will see prices in excess of 1p is post consolidation. I just can't can see us RTO'ing with a company and having our portion of the company being worth in excess of £100m.

I think 0.1 to 0.2 is more likely with the latter being very optimistic. But as always happy to be proved wrong.

1p would be amazing though lol

Says the individual posting about "He we go up institutions are buying" and "buying opportunity" "news in the morning I hear" the hallmark posts of a short term trader/ramper and all around the 2 2.05 range then "i'm back in around the 1.85" so clearly your trading this as much as you can.

As for John and andy, right to be concerned with the conflicting information between the publicly accessible website and the RNS's. But as was posted either earlier on today or yesterday, it was confirmed the RNS's are correct and the website is still out of date which will have made individuals much more confident - hence the change in tone of the posts.

Bamb - If a shop window looks crap, its less like to attract "shoppers" now is it? That being said with the KPMG audit report and the news of close to completing a 100m facility gives me great confidence this company will succeed for us all.

And for those attacking the members posting inconsistencies with the website, they have always been solid supports of this company from what I can tell and them pointing out the issues to the company should be seen as a positive thing for us all in the long run.

They can have all mine now for £1 a share :P

If they are this close to anouncing significant information which will affect the share price then surely they will be in the closed period and therefore not legally allowed to buy shares? So one could argue a lack of BOD buying is good news

No but still waiting for you to pull this mythical rns from Rathlin out of your ass lol

Id be suprised if there were to be another leak of this magnitude again. Security of any sensitive information must be getting stepped up as a result of the last few weeks.

Woodtock once again you are talking crap. The auditors report was about rathlin itself surving due large debts and this was nov 18. How can anyone ascertain the comercial viability until ewt has been completed. Stop posting incoorect misleading information

Woodie talks uter ****. He has been called out before on this supposed auditors report saying its not comercially viable and he just replies with google it. Which I have done and the only thing I can find was from Nov last year stating concerns about Rathlin energy viability due to its large debt which I believe has now been settled- not of West Newton, it has only just been classed as a oil discovery and awaiting a CPR so how can they say its not viable yet??

And that was back in 2018 before all the new info we now have

Think woodis referring to this article.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/drillordrop.com/2018/11/08/rathlin-energys-33-9m-debt-casts-doubt-over-company-viability-accounts/amp/

However it talks about the viability of rathlin NOT west newton due to its large debt. Some clearly you need to work on your so called 'research'

SP500 - one thing I'd like to point out with regards to ADME, although the Sheik pulled out, he did so with roughly 100% profit according to most people's estimates. We know antos has bought a lot at higher levels than this and likely bought the warrants at a premium so if he should leave I doubt it would be with much profit if any at all. So not really a good comparison but should Antos sell up then everyone will run for the hills but most I can't see that happening.

I think it was just a poor choice of words (rarity I know), the official RNS said Oil AND gas which has to be vetted and signed off. If there was no longer any gas they would have stated this has changed from a major gas to a major oil discovery.

Certainly right there Parkez as the 8.26 "Sell" was actually my buy.

If people are convinced of their investment here then a small 6% drop shouldn't be any reason to worry. I will admit I hope it stays at this level or lowers slight more until Wednesday when I will have funds to invest but I this should come good with all the news due.