RE: Tech Stuff,18 Jun 2020 09:54
adoubleuk... “”What you say is true, but it applies to worked-out old N.Sea 'conventional' fields, where continuing production with high water-cuts, even at a loss, is cheaper than shutting down and decomissioning.
This is something else, and I think you should do some further technical research into the 'Hurricane story' before making sweeping statements...“”
Can you please back this with your source of information link?
There many source of information available on the different sites and articles confirming the water cut and floods are common issue in old and new or current well producing oils and even gas and remedies are available in different forms and even some of these wells production ended better oil volume production than before after remedies .
The new ceo appointed had worked in Shell previously and Shell together with BP have many oilfield encountered the same issue and they are continuing to produce oil commercially profitable .
From your inputs ..the impression you give as if HUR is uniquely have this problem and you sold all your holdings due the fear that the company is going to duster...which I don’t agree.
It is a common issue in oil wells and can even be ultimately be a good thing after remedies.
We need to balance our posts here by giving a balance views...
Ramping and deramping are equally bad for genuine investors..