RE: II2 Feb 2023 14:20
Yes, I think that's very well put Dartron.
The problem with any Institutional Fund at the Smaller end of the market is liquidity.
When the music stops in Smaller companies or even slows, they simply cannot reduce exposure quickly enough without taking a bath.
The other thing to bear in mind, and you'll see it time and time again in a downturn, is fund redemptions. It can quickly become a vicious cycle and quality holdings do get trimmed as they're more likely to have the liquidity, to meet the redemption payments.
On the flip side, picking up holdings from other distressed sellers, or from placings can certainly give them a bang for their buck when conditions stabilize - as we're starting to see at this moment in time.
With small Cap placings, it's the 'High Net Worth' punters I'm more bothered about, who will sit there as traders and flip them for pennies - which they're well within their right to do, but creates a negative drag on stocks on the initial recovery.
Smoke and Mirrors are everywhere in this game, but I'm happier that Mito has been supportive, and Amstrong has come on board .
BTW with regard to Armstrong, I reckon they've bought a token amount before approaching the Board to acquire a further stake in size at an advantageous price. Again, all speculation, just throwing it out there.