Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
I don't care
I don't care
I don't care if he comes round 'ere
Got my beer in the sideboard `ere
Let muvver sort ' im out
If he comes round 'ere
I don't care
I don't care
I don't care if he comes round 'ere
Got my beer in the sideboard' ere
Let muvver sort 'im out
If he comes round ' ere!
Recessional!
$86 intra day and rising. Big problem when $100 as that would be resessional. Interest rates up, etc.
I've predicted $200 in future. Rampant inflation? So complicated is this black stuff.
What wrapper are they in? What profits have you made elsewhere by selling?
Of course benefial owners can turn into members by converting nominee held shares to paper certificates. Not a road I would go down.
$86
$84.8
Two buyscirca 5.75p
Maybe we've shamed CEO to invest.
Whoops, fel asleep there. Strange dream, thought Sam was reasonable.,
Huh removal is 75% of votes?
Chair should put up for re-election I think. Maybe CEO will crawl under a rock...
Up again to mid 80s. Not long now for $100.
Agree and yes removal is only way. BOD should put themselves up for reelection if they think the II's are happy.
Well done Glenr... someone had to take the lead and we learned more about process. Next time maybe do it in private on SeaLion dot co dot uk/shareholders site away from prying eyes.
Let's hope Italy will come good soon.
Please see below a message from Keith Lough, Chairman
Dear Mr Everett,
Thank you again for your recent communications regarding a possible general meeting and I confirm that, having sought legal advice, a General meeting will not be called at this time. I will seek to explain some of the background to that but you will understand that I cannot offer what would amount to legal advice.
You will recall, going back to the commencement of these initiatives, that I made 3 points: that you seek good corporate legal advice, that I was and remain confident that your proposed resolutions are not supported by our remaining institutions and other shareholders, and that the role of the board is to enact the will of shareholders generally. The whole Board has real sympathy with the challenges of our situation, and what this may have meant for individual investors, but we must give proper effect to the interests of all shareholders and our legal requirements.
When I referred to your approach as a distraction, I neither meant to offend nor judge the sincerity of your wishes but to inform you that we are finding your process something of a challenge at a time when we are seeking to find a way to retain the licence and secure wider industry support to develop SLD in a tightening market for finance, increased ESG pressures and with continued interference from Argentina.
The executive and I have taken material action on overall costs and our own salaries and fees, consulting with institutional shareholders as we did that, but we need to keep investing to progress the asset and avoid losing the licence entirely. The Board is very clear that we have executives who have responded very well and quickly to the changing environment and they remain the right people to find a new stable platform to progress the asset; this remains strategically and commercially very difficult.
I am deeply concerned that we are now engaged in a negative cycle of interaction which is continually compounded by misleading information that emerges from certain bulletin boards, often without transparency of purpose or authorship. We will always welcome bona fide enquiry or offers of support from shareholders that improve our chances of delivering value from the NFB.
Finally I will take this opportunity to confirm that, should we receive a properly constructed requisition for a meeting along with resolutions that are capable of being put to shareholders, we will respond accordingly and in accordance with the Companies Act.
Keith Lough
Chairman, Rockhopper Exploration plc
Got mine. Now cut the talk and let's walk. Resolutions to remove chairman, CEO and cfo. Don't get swamped in legal terms.
I did warn about restriction to trade. That will be their defence on current proposal
Just sack them.
Q&A Webinar on 19th of October. See/hear you there. See on page above.
Cannot rule out a final demand from FIG for $60million tax owed. It might just play a role and before too long!
Nice! If only 30p was breakeven for most of us! Mine would be 87p, so any influence to that is gratefully appreciated.
Don't discount a suspension pending announcement
New Twitter statement from HE1.