RE: Ineos6 May 2026 01:30
FordM,
I am sure that those who move their residency to Monaco do not do so purely for tax reasons, as there are other tax havens, some of them more generous. They also go for the weather o nthe stable politics, or the fact that it is still in Europe, or for any other number of reasons. So, do agree with you that people emigrate for all sorts of reasons.
It is frankly very rich for you to criticise the speck in someone else's eye, when you have a beam in your own! What is the word for this...ah yes, hypocrisy.
Had you studied critical thinking, you woukd know that ad hominem attacks are out of bounds as a technique for arguing, as it is merely an attack on the man, and not his argument. Is that because your own argument is non-existent or full of holes? In football (soccer to you), we call it playing the man and not the ball.
As for knowledge of taxation matters, in obtaining my ACCA qualification, I had to pass two tax papers, so whilst a long time ago now, I am not arguing from a postion of total ignorance. Sure, I know abount double taxation relief, but for those who renounce their USA citizenship, their tax affairs are way easier. Just a fortnight or so ago, I spoke to a US man who has been in England for over thirty years, and he was grumbling about having to make US tax returns. What annoyed him most was that the fiscal years did not coincide exactly, so he had to provide multiple sets of accounts to allow for this. So a real ball breaker for him or his accountant.
Earlier, I wrote anout how poison gas is a tyoe of WMD, but my tablet crashed before posting! I shall keep this brief, therefore.
There are three recognised types of WMD, according to the UN definition, including nuclear weapons, chemical weapons and biological weapons. Poison gas fits into the chemical type. Look up the Chemical weapons Convention.
No, I am not a 'bot', but so what if I were one? Of course, as the ad says, it is what i should say were I one! Are you able to produce an argument that is not so full of hiles that a bot or a 'idiot', as you caled me, can refute far too easily?
I am, however, surprised that you have given up, though your additional insults hurled my way are not. Thanks! Their use by you in place of argument tells me that there is only one winner here.
Have a great life!
Sign In
Follow the stocks
