RE: There we go , a few18 Mar 2026 14:19
Here is the latest thoughts of Twogood. You cannot say it is not "balanced" . The risks are not skated over. Of course if you are fundamentally Unbalanced you may struggle to read it.
"Well he's cutting it a bit fine thats for sure!
Some aspects should be relatively easy to deliver.
i) Sale of IP platform by SFE to Supply@Me but if he sets a high cash element and high conversion share price on the deal to detriment of retail this won't go unnoticed by the market. Personally I would keep the cash element very low and conversion price high to keep dilution sub 10% to show he is also sharing risk with investors. Afterall he's taking a paid salary and delivered to date nothing of note but shareholder value destruction. To some extent cash element is already capped based on Nuburu funding limit, so possibly mainly shares than cash I would suspect.
ii) The completion of the inventory monetisation pilot with Tekne should complete without legal, tax, or accounting issues having run enough cycles.
iii) Appointment of at least 2 maybe 3 NED's with SACE experience or similar defence industry experience. Coupled with Alessandro willingness to recluse from day to day operational control of Supply@Me to the NED's will be paramount.
The tougher slower ones.
iv) Government guarantees for inventory monetisation. Banks and lenders need these to facilitate funding and mitigate credit recourse risk of borrower going bust.
v) Bank funder like BBPM or similar being announced with at least heads of terms signed and committed to lend or fund the inventory monetisation program.
If he announces i, ii, iii completed with iv, v progressing he has a fighting chance."