Member Info for HallsWorthy

But they didn't buy in tiny amounts, did they? They bought all of the founders shares and JP Morgan have bought more since too.

Now you're saying you think cash will be below 37 in the interims (in September? Another stupid error I'm guessing, you didn't mean interims you meant year end). You said that for the last interims and we're so wildly out you utterly embarrassed yourself.

Must have had smoke coming out of your ears when that amazing update dropped. Can't wait for part two in april

A simple "yes I'm scared to answer the question" would have been faster

Scared of the question? You were claiming cash of around 29m last time around I think, when it was 37m. I didn't ask what you thought it would be, I asked what level you would consider "good"

Buy I mean

Another 2.7m but has gone through but what to they know ;)

Stt, with HVO results around the corner, what revenue and what profit level would you consider "good" with guidance at £56m, already ahead of market expectations

Just add it to the ridiculously long list of stupid things he's said

By the way, market makers don't control the price, they provide a market. Supply and demand control the price and I'd argue on a miniscule stock like ukog, bulletin boards quite often affect the share price, mostly in the shirt to medium term but if it is a loss making company in a death spiral, the effects become long term and snowball

If the company haven't said it, where have you got the idea from exactly? Why not say that could quadruple or go 100x? Seems totally arbitrary and very rampy

...unless you have a source?

Of course the IP was shielded, he'll probably sell that off to a private company he owns for £1 and go on to huge things.

The real lesson to be learnt is to never invest in lossmaking aim stocks. It's a lesson pretty much everyone on these boards has to learn at some point. The real question is whether you actually learn that or if you chase another rainbow. Understand that there are no consistent ways to make quick money, all you are doing is gambling if you are chasing multi bags.

Fool me once. Shame on you etc.

Very unusual work by the market makers at the moment, offering nothing up to 50000, then asking 29.9p for anything over, it was like this a week or two back and I haven't seen that before for sustained periods

Scam might be a strong word but AIM failure and utterly useless CEO, yes.

The only thing I'd say is the writing has been on the wall for sometime, just like many other failures, it doesn't come out of the blue yet investors take a blinkered view all too often.

DONT INVEST IN LOSS MAKING AIM SHARES

Stunned silence?

Are you blind? I even told you the date of a tr1 yet you still claim it's not there? Haha

Clearly didn't know what a nominal dividend was when you first posted about it, maybe better just to occasionally hold your hands up and say "yeah I learnt something" rather than dig yourself a bigger hole with every post - you do that quite a lot in fact, which is why you can never discuss shares on loan or the business model

Stt "Still no TR1s"

Can't even read a basic TR1 from 2nd Feb.

Add that to the list of clueless statements he's made:

Having no idea what a nominal dividend is

Asking why pharma doesn't build their own CRO offering

Not knowing how to read a tr1

Constantly saying "questionable business model" without ever explaining the throwaway quite, to a company with an incredibly strong business model

Saying how low the cash balance would be in results, then it turned out it had actually gone hugely up.

Not understanding shares on loan.

Encouraging people to invest at TLY at 46.5P

Discouraging people from investing in HVO at 9p

Aka "you're right, I had no idea what a nominal dividend is, until I just googled it"

Oops I don't think Stt knows what nominal means. Add that to the list of misunderstandings

I'd guess 1p per share

I don't think they made a blind bit of difference to the alleged results