Member Info for HallsWorthy

Damn, bad to worse for little old eqtec

Couldn't give a crap if you slate the company, doesn't affect me at all. Just pulling you up for saying that consolidation wipes you out, and wondering if you could explain why a stock merge or split wipes anyone out (clue, it doesn't).

Also, well aware of tym history and it's dire. Only plus is it leaves the SP down in the doldrums and even good news has underwhelming responses as the trust is gone. Why is this good? Because it sets up a massive movement If/when revenue DOES finally come in which is why some of us are buying down here as the grass shoots of something more "proper" are showing especially on recent silver findings which already looks economically viable on the face of it - more than tym ever managed prior.

Jedster, what's the problem with this raise exactly? Easily the best terms they've ever had on a raise and best price when compared to current. Also, why does consolidation "wipe you out"? Do you actually understand the basics of how either of these things work?

Don't use any of the major banks to trade shares is my first comment, they are miles behind dedicated providers like IG and are even now losing out on the banking side to more dynamic offerings like Monzo

Why is 0.17 on close "utter tosh"? As good as any prediction you'd make and not far from it

Why is that relevant to what the share price is doing now? In fact, it's probably a good argument for why people should average down.

Large spread and high buy price, looks like filling an order to soak up all the buys while discouraging others to buy what does get sold. Given the large and fast movements, it looks like they are in a hurry too so expect RNS within the next week with positive news. Will be a holdings RNS coming for sure

Precisely Rd, it is not possible that someone would do that without a plan that they know will reach fruition. Sit and hold, could be absolutely massive.

Exactly right Pandy, I'm is awash with companies who promise the world for years on end and achieve absolutely nothing notable. Effectively "lifestyle companies" that over pay their board while promising the world to gullible investors. Certainly tym had all the hallmarks for many years although it is also showing signs of becoming more legitimate. You need at least one, profitable venture to show the world you mean business and if tym gets that it should rerate in a heartbeat. It's just that these stories are rare so people are understandably cautious and there is always the chance to miss out on the initial 100% rise, but getting in for the 1000% that follows in the year after.

Yes, grandfather rights have gone, £30 million valuation is needed

Ridiculous time to be selling, I agree. Reid clearly has intentions and this is the cheapest main-listed shall going. It's an easy 2-3 bagger here before anything meaningful even happens with news flow

Ah typical stt, loses an argument, doesn't acknowledge, never mentions it again.

Do none of you understand how an RTO works?

Ironically you could hardly have picked a better example to highlight as to why you are an idiot for asking why is pharmas don't just work with Chinese CROs on everything:

https://www.biospace.com/wuxi-apptec-shared-client-ip-with-beijing-say-us-intelligence-officials-reuters?hl=en-GB

Ah as always, moving the goalposts when you are shown to be incredibly stupid.

For YEARS now you have been banging on asking why China doesnt replicate hvivos business. I gave you so many chances to work it out for yourself yet you couldn't. I finally spell it out to you and you completely ignore all points and answer a question that I never asked.

Try again to counteract my points on China's espionage and IP theft and why they are highly undesirable for western pharmas to give their new drugs to for testing.

I do like the chances for a recovery okay but the technicals just look so bad. Close to 10p seems bolted on and (obviously) a more attractive buy zone so will watch and wait

I asked you what I considered pretty patronising questions before to help you work it out yourself and you still couldn't. I guess I'll finally spell this out:

What you're asking is "why don't western, predominantly US pharmas, give their new, propriety drugs that they've already spent millions on to companies set up in a country that is Americas main economic enemy and the world leader in spying and intellectual property theft, to test and approve?"

You stupidly is honestly unravelled. I wish I'd kept a track of some of these idiotic statements you make time and time again.

I make a habit of not replying to the resident cretin but he's started asking why Chinese companies don't open their own facilities- one of the most incredibly stupid questions he ever asks that must make anyone with an iq above 50 realise how stupid he truly is

Very well summarised, Jester.

A single contract could actually turn us profitable for FY. A while back, we would only have dreamed of being profitable in a bad year. Sentiment is noise, quality will shine through.

Poolbeg took it over?