Member Info for guzzler1962

He might gain some respect if he bought some stock. After all, he did promise all time high prices by November.

Spread was equivalent of 0.33 v 0.36.

Always amazes me that people spout 14% up, or 18% down. Those figures represent the advertised spread which generally is a false spread.

Barry

Is now a good time to remind you that you tried to convince me via direct messages that the Krunch acquisition in March last year didn't come with extra dilution to the recently announced 0.3p Placing?

I had to copy and paste the relevant parts of the RNS to show you were very much talking nonsense.

Not sure what you think you have to offer, but interpreting RNS isn't one of your strong points.

Barry

I was hoping he had a little bit more to offer than you and your "watch this space" or "1p in 4 weeks" nonsense. Sadly he's on a path to quickly overtake you as the main one to ignore.

Barker

It's very telling that when I posed these particular questions to you in the Hive Telegram Group you pulled the "I won't debate with you" card. At the time the group had 1500 members, a big audience to make your pitch to. Opportunity missed. Thick as mince. If I recall correctly you advised me to stick to this platform. Debating MOS in the Hive was suppressed, unless it was "watch this space" type guff.

So here we are, attempting to debate the "here and now". That's where our focus should be according to our biggest shareholder. But yet again, a Tr1 holder and Advisor to boot has absolutely nothing of relevance to offer.

I can't wait for the weekend for football score updates....

Exciting times

#letsgo

Barker

Considering you are an advisor to the Company you do manage to post some rubbish. Everything is smoke and mirrors with you, an attempt to shy away from the important issues regarding MOS.

So once again I will provide you with the opportunity to debate the "here and now".

11 months ago cash was raised to secure contracts. The CEO is on record saying that the contracts to be announced were of such quality, and the revenue from them so valuable that another raise wasn't necessary. At the time he also claimed to have £2.2M cash available.

How much revenue has those contracts brought in?

How much cash do we have?

What is the situation with IGS, has $1.8M revenue per annum been lost?

With Pumas and Fed Mex now 12 months in, have the agreed targets been met to guarantee revenue?

Why haven't we had the expected trading update?

Barker and Barry

A new Broker aiding a Company to raise money. Some people with an eye for these things, and some people who have also experienced such a thing (me) could regard a Company appointing a new Broker as a precursor to another Placing.

Add in the fact the news of a new Broker is being ramped without any substance by those close to the BOD and it certainly raises a red flag.

The only positive of course is Peterhouse have gone and won't be able to hold us over a barrel.

Barry

Any comment on Panmure and All Things Considered? I keep taking your advice regarding research and found that after Panmure were appointed their Broker (the Company operates on the lower trading platform Aquis) they swiftly aided in a cash call.

Any thoughts?

If only someone could verify the revenue received from NFTs this year, or verify the IGS situation.

$150K per month is a hefty amount to suddenly go missing.

The only thing we are certain of is the BOD took options for their salary instead of cash/shares to preserve capital.

Barker

It's how I interpreted it. Opinions are allowed.

Meanwhile, I'm not the only one that sees the smoke and mirrors tactics employed here.

I'd say his prediction is no trading update (financials) until then.

He's not saying no news.

Predictions are allowed aren't they? I'm sure I read an early August prediction for financials, and a £8.4M Mcap prediction for next month?

Weedave

You're not the only one I suspect. Fastest fingers first eh?

Barry

Here's an illustration for you.

On the 3 year anniversary of your 5.1% Tr1 notification, despite almost quadrupling the shares in issue to win multiple contracts and acquisitions, the Mcap of the Company was pretty much the same.

Of course, this situation could well be due to lack of transparency on NFT revenue and could all change with one, well written RNS.

Barry

Thank you for the lecture. You're quite correct, I've no idea how business works or the effect dilution has on small cap start ups. So you've motivated me to take another long hard look at how things have worked here over the last 3 years since you notified the Company of your 5% holding with just shy of 60 million shares.

At the time there were 1.15B shares in issue, a SP of 0.25p giving a Mcap of £2.87M.

Today there are 4.37B shares in issue, a SP of 0.093p giving a Mcap of a tad above £4M.

You have recently notified you now hold 6%. That 20% increase in percentage holding has cost you an extra 200M+ shares.

How does this investing malarkey work again? How much does that bigger picture actually cost these days? Perhaps you can help me "get it"?

On second thoughts, perhaps not.....

Barry

I know why they did the raise. Without it they couldn't close deals out.

Remember those deals? 30 wasn't it? Between $5M and $25M according to the CEO......

As for foresight, is that the stuff you used as an "industry expert" in affiliate revenue? £100M Mcap from Argentina and Brazil???

Barker

11 months after conducting a 33% discounted placing from 0.27p the SP languishes under 0.095p.

A really don't think an Advisor to the Company can take the moral high ground here, especially since many have been signaling this sad state of affairs could occur due to lack of transparency.

Barker

I had been in the group a matter of hours when you attempted to discredit me.

This led to lots of probing questions regarding what had been promised by the BOD, what had been achieved, transparency on NFT revenue and the use of dark pool(?) trading.

Despite my questions I was very much prepared to listen to a reason why this would turn around.

At every opportunity you would respond with some kind of spiteful retort in an attempt to bury the very relevant questions.

Sad really that the only way the owner could rescue you was to deem Tr1 holders within the group couldn't be scrutinised because calling them out might see them leaving the forum.

Says more about them than me.

Is that the group where Tr1 holders are protected from scrutiny? Where Tr1 holders aren't allowed to be questioned?

The group that claims its based on balanced research and actively encourages holders to post their investment case for other members?

Except of course for this stock.

I did say I'd provide a list of misinformation but was removed prior to doing so. Strange thing for a balanced forum to do.

SP tanked 30% too, now the clowns are claiming some kind of victory.

It's all a bit "Emperors New Clothes" in my opinion.

Let's see how many sell the news after buying the rumour, like they did with Bitso.

Anyone else notice that when the biggest shareholder made yet another claim this morning it was the last chance to buy under 0.1p, the stock went NT to sell at 0.095p?

His strike rate at calling this incorrectly is phenomenal.

Exciting times

#letsgo

Barker

Are you saying you have never highlighted Opensea purchases as they were going through?

As for factual Cadiz posts, hmmmm, strange you don't comment on Necaxa who are bottom of Liga Mx, or on Lopez who missed the cut last weekend.

I see you.