Member Info for guzzler1962

Awe bless. Did your mate put you up to it? I assume he will be along soon? Are you going to tell everyone not to touch this with a bargepole, just like you did with MRS at 3.5p? (I did the opposite).

Have to agree in regards to sentiment, I'm surprised there isn't more appetite at this price. However, with relatively low free float, if there are sellers down it goes. The same of course is true for buyers, up it will go. Bit disappointed to see it retrace to placing price, but that's the norm rather than the exception on AIM. Gutted I didn't take advantage to be honest. Didn't you promise us you wouldn't post until next update? Yet another trait that can be added to an already questionable persona.

Does that mean you have taken a position in readiness for the spike you mentioned is due before year end? And we can expect to hear from you when you have sold.....again.

Yasx, you do seem to be extremely caught up in the games that are played out on LSE and other platforms. What is it exactly you are trying to achieve? Are you saying posters have multiple monikers? Perish the thought. And there and rampers and derampers too? Posters that change their opinions depending on their position? Is that even allowed? Peeps will be taking profit next, surely that doesn't happen on AIM? What we need is a Knight in shining armour to save us all from ourselves. Arise Sir Yasx, defender of AIM.

There you go, once again investors referred to as mug punters. Would you care to repeat your desire to witness investors lose all their money here?

You are indeed correct, it's my matter. My opinion also differs from yours, but you do seem very intent on persuading me to alter it? As always, your opinion is noted.

Again I will reiterate. If there is coal, which is the objective, I expect to see a good return. I continue to hold, though your concern for my investment is noted.

Not here for name calling?? Unfortunately, even if you make valid points, I will have a tendency to dismiss them. You refer to investors here as mug punters. You change other posters monikers in an derogatory manner. You stated that you hope investors lose all their money. You have a vendetta with a major shareholder here and in MRS. I find your style of posting entirely disagreeable, which in one respect is frustrating, but in another respect, simply sad.

One argument, or question, that is put across by posters across LSE forums is "if a resource is so good, why hasn't a major player bought it"? Those posing that particular question are usually cut from the same cloth. 88energy, Prem, URU, all sitting on huge resources. Circum Minerals, massive, has been in the process of being sold for months and months. The trick is to prove it up first, and prove its commercially viable, a sticking point for the fat ladies currently. As for ANR, we'll here's the thing. If no coal, no return. But if there is coal, and dry coal, and substantial quantities...........? Risk versus reward. I continue to hold and confident of seeing a return. GLA

As we have already established, a personal vendetta against a major shareholder. Go grind your axe elsewhere.

Altona (AIM: ANR) is pleased to update shareholders with further information regarding the recently commissioned report being undertaken by Runge Pincock Minarco Global (�RPM�). Following further discussions with its mining consultants, WSP Australia Pty Ltd (�WSP�), the Board has decided to extend the scope of the report to include potentially prospective areas within the Company�s Wintinna and Murloocoppie tenements. The intention is to try to identify further suitable drier/less wet sites for coal mining development which will be the focus of subsequent stages of exploration for the Company. Let's wait and see what the results of the report say shall we? I'm sure things will become more clearer as to whether there is any coal or not??? As for the negative points the naysayers have pointed out, it would be folly to dismiss them out of hand, but the true reason they are here is due to some kind of vendetta against one of the major shareholders which doesn't interest one iota. GLA

Sorry can't help. I wasn't stating a fact, I was asking for clarification of my interpretation of Suns points.

Sun, just to clarify, Brokers took the shares at the placing price, but were willing to advise their clients to purchase at a premium? Surely a positive if I have read it correctly?

Obviously that wasn't meant for Trevor.

I believe one point you made was the major shareholders would be selling. The opposite seems to have happened, they have bought. Another observation was a drop of 75%, which again, to date is not the case. As always, your concern here is noted.

Play in operation here now. Fully funded for the next 12 months, majority shareholders adding, BOD adding and taking options, increased responsibility with report due soon. I'm very comfortable in holding this now and pleased I've built a position here. GLA

As for somebody being keen to exit this morning, I must admit I considered removing profit first think for mrs but missed the opportunity. More than happy to continue holding despite the efforts of non shareholders.

Did you really just say you hope to see people lose their money? I honestly can't think of anything lower that can be said to investors on a forum. Some posters may not deserve to make money due to their questionable morals, but would I want to see them lose? Absolutely not! Different morals, different upbringing I suppose?

It's those that have held a position for a long time here that aren't being considered. Sitting on losses but can see a recovery plan in play, the SP improving, a change in sentiment, which we all know is half the battle, yet a poster who doesn't hold a position doing his level best to deramp this. Not right in my opinion.

Once again your views and concerns are noted. Always good to have a negative aspect to any forum since it adds balance. I do wish you could do so without the snide remarks about current holders though.