Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
quote: what a beautiful language English is- sometimes...' I'll be happy to be a monkey's uncle if it rockets into an uptrend, which I thnk highly unlikely, and will pop in now and then to accept my punishment should it behave as you suggest' from Chartist2 Thur 23.48
is it me getting older? I had this a few times recently - where the thought came, they ( the Ceo ' s) are just embellishing their intention with the stories the public want to hear with regard what their wonderful products or tech will be able to do. But any cold air will blow the narrative apart. Perhaps that's the name of the game of early stage investing ... well I hope you get my drift.
I hold a small but still significant for me number of N4p. As it happens I was doing someresearch about the cannabis industry in Canada after legalisation. Alternative or improved delivery methods are the focus of the day/month. There are a couple of companies with patented methods, here is one https://www.lexariabioscience.com/technology/patent-portfolio/ or www.nanosperehealth.com the reason I'm writing this is twofold: on one hand the technique owned by N4p could possibly be used in the emerging Cannabis market. On the other hand the tech of these two Canadian companies ( through skin or nose and mouth) will compete with N4p and might well be superior. Cannabis culture is dominated by oral ingestion and inhalation methods of consumption. Edibles, smoking and vaping are enjoyed recreationally and are increasingly used for medicinal purposes.
quote ..the mainstream methods of consuming and administering marijuana are potentially problematic for a number of reasons. Fortunately, innovative new administration methods that deliver cannabinoids through the skin—using transdermals—or through the mucosa in the nose and mouth—using intranasal and intraoral products—are on the rise, offering promising solutions to the common issues associated with traditional cannabis delivery.
I do appreciate your realistic assessment of AIM shenanigans. Anybody intrested in Aim shares for more than a few months will have observed this phenomen: share price rises on all kind of positive projections etc and then -- what a surprise - a fundraising, via issue of new shares or convertibles (= dilution of existing value) is anounced and shareprice drops. As long as the company is working hard on realizing a promising objective , I tend to regard this almost as legit manoeverings albeit on the back of the PI
not significant, just a tax avoidance exercise caused by wrongly set up scheme. But the conditions for the Ceo, make nice reading:
1. Being awarded a contract on a track car from a mainstream volume OEM;
2. Being awarded a contract for a volume road car from a mainstream volume OEM; and/or
3. Generating revenue in a financial year of not less than £5m.
I get the overall picture of INFA and it is a very persuasive, almost utility like- guaranteed income. I just wish to see more numbers how exactly the' rent' they chargefor the management of their sotrage facility will look like.
I'm not a Ta specialist ,but this looks good to me, head and shoulder completed..
once they ve driven it down to 4 the sp will jump up like a 'cork that was pressed under water'. if i had some spare dinheiro i'd buy more now at these levels
Justain Wait/Vox Nicola predicted a drop to 4.3 might be on the cards, followed by a nice rise. SP seems to follow that script - ---
monthly admin �1mil monthly research costs �500k monthly REV- �300k monthly cash burn �1.2 million cash at 1/1/18 �20 mill cash now CIRCA �16.5 million and the enormous spred between bid and offer? any comments wellcome
good point, Rob. The first time someone pointed that out , that the initial flowrates do change/fall over time,- in that respect he is much more responsible, less manipulative with his publshed data.
I'm not a total T A aficionado, but appreciate/accept that if you apply different timeframes to the TA picture you get different answers. In NTOG's case this is beautifully illustrated: the 5 year chart clearly suggest that the falling upper resistance line had been touched three times and never broken and 'now' it looks like we have rached bottom and the resistanceline will be broken. the' now' in this timeframe can be anything between 2 and 8 month within that period you get all kind of differnt scenarios. just my thoughts
Professor John Oxford, a leading flu expert at Queen Mary University of London, �I am enthusiastic about universal vaccines full-stop would be nice to know details of the partnership deal between hVIVO and PepTcell Limited.
Sometimes a drop is staged by big investors to let another investor in on the cheap. Normally tte price will rise back up or more within a few days. Too early to say but no real need to panic?! famous last words(?!)
IN case you haven't listened to it, well worth it https://audioboom.com/posts/6809861-matt-lofgran-ceo-of-nostra-terra-ntog-130418