RE: Scott3 Apr 2024 22:05
@Perki123 You're a fool.
Perhaps instead of blind stupidity, you'd like to offer a reasoned rebuttal of the post which Scot & I suggested Troughsnout dare copy here:
Troughsnout
2 Apr 2024 09:53
Posts: 104
Price: 28.40
Correction - second page shows 10-77bopd with an avg of 42. Total barrels recovered - 24 in total (!). Pretty high water cut but obvs frack fluids. 1.45mmscf of raw gas produced too (final page). So apart from water cut of 85% + at end of test you've got 10:1 gas to oil (calorific equiv). Bottom line - its a low pressure wet gas field.
ReplyRecommend (1)Report Post
Troughsnout
2 Apr 2024 09:23
Posts: 104
Price: 28.20
Great that they have flowed oil to surface but a peak gauge flow rate of 70 barrels a day doesn't give us any info about how much oil flowed over how many days in total or even an average for a day (I mean how long did it flow at this rate, over what period, what was the average etc). So, while nice to get oil to surface it is an extremely selective bit of data to issue. Secondly it doesn't tell us how much gas flowed (or water for that matter). 40 api oil is pretty close to condensate or drip gas. So again it looks like a significant amount of gas production with a modest amount of oil. Begging the question what to do with the gas. As referenced in my earlier remarks on the Ahpun topset.