Member Info for Greenmachine67

Shorts,shorts and more shorts. 6 -7 posts from a non-holder who has in the past sailed very close to the wind with spurious comments openly. Maybe it’s time that the people he is so openly speaking of get to know about it.

Mick, I’ve been there a few times. What I would say is that because I used the word confident I didn’t say convinced because they are different. I’d keep my powder dry ready to buy in if good and buy in on a drop. Either way you limit your losses

G’day mate 😂😂

Of course I can see that but at the same time don’t see any alternative within the structure we have in place. I’ve asked yesterday and today for opinions on how things could have been different but nobody came forth with an alternative. Speaks volumes if you ask me

Happy et al, ok point taken I apologise to you all for getting too personal. From now on I am not going to get involved. Good luck to all rampers and derampers 😄

Yes, no dfs appears to mismanagement but I think it’s been telegraphed for weeks and I did say last week I didn’t think it’d be released on time. I’m not despondent just a realist

MrC, everyone has to decide for themselves how to play it. FWIW, I am still super confident here, it’s just that sometimes you can take profit and buy back in. However, what I’d never do is post with a view to influence the way I wish the sp direction of travel to be. I know we’re in the doghouse re sp but once material news kicks in I think we’re off to the races

😂😂 bye

The consequences for me have been great, bought and sold 3 times. It’s just that I go about it without harping on player

I said I never mentioned the dfs not KC

Never mentioned the dfs, that’ll take care of itself. All the others are equally or more important. Anyway, no more conversation with you. Hopefully you remember how to pull your breeks back up.

Your interpretation not mine. His point is that all of the jigsaw pieces will come together at roughly the same time. Offtake/partnership, CRMA, financing, strategic asset status, financing, czech and eu grants, finance and fid. And yet here you are with you sitting on your computer with your trousers at you ankles looking for ways to continually berate KC. Sad sad sad little man....

I give up skelly, you are a manchild.....

Took you years to realise and yet you're still here going over the same drivel time and time again. Give me examples of what a new CEO would do differently?

Repeat repeat repeat repeat repeat.......bash bash bash bash bash.............always the same topic skelly. Hardly ever a post fails to mention KC or how he is unsuitable for the job. Failure to respond to my question from just amplifies my belief that nobody who is seeking the removal of KC has any idea of who should replace him or how they would operate differently under the terms of the aggrement we have with geomet. Easy to criticise but not so easy to fix.

“Of course it's risky. That's the whole point in investing in small market cap AIM shares. Bigger risks equal bigger reward. Why don't you go invest in Apple or Facebook mate. You're in the game.“

Https://youtu.be/SR5WUvcLdVE?si=EN3WS3dRkB-V3wwo

Interview from yesterday

Oh forgot to mention. Wiseinvestor isnt giving anyone grief for being frustrated. Instead he's pointing out the deramper that posts more than anyone else. For the avoidance of doubt, skelly is a player.....

Scob, I did ask a question earlier today with peoples thoughts on how a different CEO would have done a better job, how and when. Nobody replied except skelly and his reply was not really a reply just something along the lines of learning from previous mistakes, wtf? Tell me how you think it could have been done?

“Of course it's risky. That's the whole point in investing in small market cap AIM shares. Bigger risks equal bigger reward. Why don't you go invest in Apple or Facebook mate. You're in the game.“

What changed skelly? This is what you wrote on this board remember?