Member Info for GrandQ

Del929

I know you have a list of questions that you submitted to YJ and that last year you submitted many questions at the AGM which I believe included questions from other shareholder which you collated.

Are you intending to do similar for this Webinar?

If so my initial question would be 'Why are we going down the route of as TFA instead of selling the concentrate that is in secure storage and valued @ circa £5,000,000"

I haven't posed in to the Investor meet site.

Point 3 is strange that they have not said to the company through YJ but I would assume that is what is implied.

GLA

Magnum.PI

A quick search online indicates that none of those you mentioned allow trading on the AIX but it would probably be safer to ask your broker directly.

GLA

Roger65

The last time this question was raised I believe it only prompted one response from lovelyboy on the 9th October as follows:-

"According to the last caseboard documents I accessed the hearing was scheduled for the earliest available court slot after 1st week in Nov. 3 days duration. If I remember correctly submissions needed to be finalised by the end of Sept to give a minimum of 6 weeks prep time. This would fit with the last filing date 26th last month. "

Any discussion about Eurasia mining is rapidly drowned out by the posters who only seem to be interested in name calling and childish comments about other posters on both sides. Eurasia mining has virtually become a side issue on this forum.

GLA

OSF

Surely they will need shareholder agreement for the Shares/Warrants relating to the TFLA, that may be the difference between the company surviving or not. Hopefully the wording (if requested) will limit new shares issued for that purpose only.

I would not be able to vote against that.

GLA

OSFan

Personally I have given up on trying to understand anything that happens now with EUA but I think you may be somewhat correct with you last paragraph.

Wait and see I guess.

GLA

Cybaajak

Interesting thoughts but to correct your timings the rise to 42pps was 2nd December 2020.

Jjjzac

Caseboard has shown the case concluded for a long time, it's not new info.

JohnHenry

Just going by the latest RNS

"After casing and cementing, drilling will re-commence on the final reservoir section of the State 36-2R well. The objective for this short section is to safely and successfully land the well within the Cane Creek reservoir (the "Cane Creek") and drill approximately 270 feet horizontally to intersect the productive natural fracture system encountered in the original well. "

No wish to get into a lengthy back and forth.

GLA

JohnHenry

It's a good update, all going as expected, but not through the fracture just yet.

GLA

@del929

I am not disagreeing with you here as I think your 1st paragraph has a lot of merit.

You said previously you had been in regular contact with Yellow Jersey, is this where your "I have a feeling comes from", i.e. your interpretation of some of their comments to you?.

The other point I find strange is that CS at the last AGM said that settling ownership of the shares would not have any bearing on any possible asset sale. I do appreciate that things have moved on and that may have changed and of course "we" are not privvy to anything much at all.

Just curious really and fed up with reading all the playground stuff.

Sharebel

What a strange post, my interpretation o f this thread has been a polite exchange discussing whether or not the Queeld/Mispare issue with share certificates has been totally resolved and what the final outcome is.

I don't see either ramping or deramping, just an exchange of information/thoughts.

This is one reason I rarely post.

GLA

Mizman

I appreciate that, I just don't use Telegram at all, too many social media apps!

GLA

DATTABASE!

If you use the link lovelyboy posted you will see that the Caseboard Inferred Status is 'Case Concluded (Settled)'.

I am fairly sure it has been that way since the Tomlin Order was issued in November, but not 100% certain.

What you need is to read the Order issued by the Judge on 13th March 2024 but I am not a subscriber either.

I expect someone in the Telegram group has access to it but they will have paid for that and may not wish to share it here.

Having issued an RNS on the subject previously one might expect EUA to issue another one confirming the situation, but I would generally have expected much more information from EUA, as we all know they prefer the silent treatment.

GLA

I rarely respond to nonsense but isn't this post a bit funny.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Treadingcarefuly

Posts: 1,687

Price: 2.05

No Opinion

RE: Tidying upToday 10:25

That’s an assumption. No one knows if the eua made that timescale or it was the court🤷 either way it’s game over of Eurasia hasn’t announced a sale by 5 March 2024.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No assumption in that last bit ?

Sorry missed a "0"

288,500,000

Magnum.PI

Queeld bought 288,500,00 @ 1 pps and 18,750,000 @ .48 pps

As for the likelihood of them selling in March, plenty on here will have opinions no doubt but none will know.

Del929

Yes most likely, although delayed as usual as I believe his holding would have changed on the 8th Nov from memory, but nice to see it more up to date and showing Queeld still holding.

Don't know if already mentioned but just to note the Share Capital page on EUA website has been updated, Queeld still showing as owning what they previously owned, no other major changes that I can see/remember.

GLA

Offler

A look at the newly (29th August 2023) posted share capital on the EUA website gives some of the information, although it is not possible to identify the individual shareholders who are not named it does tell us that Nominee accounts appear to hold over 50% of the shares in issue with Queeld holding a further 10.75%.

I cannot see the original post as Toffers has been filtered by me for as long as I remember and I don't ever log out to read filtered posts.

RetiredBanker.

While I agree in principal with your post 12:23 it is not accurate to simply say DS and CS purchased their shares at less than 1p. CS for example purchased 950,000 shares in 2008 at an average of 3.3p per share and in his interview with Proactive Investors some 3 years + ago DS states his first £1million pound investment also in 2008 was at 5p per share.

The average price paid for their shares may be below 1p but I have no inclination to attempt to work that out.