Member Info for gordon1237

The grand old Duke of Yuri. Lol. Gla.

Except perhaps, item 03, " 10% capacity to issue shares under rule 7.1a". Presumably, that means prior authorization to dilute by 10% if needed ? Atb.

Tsbs, you were right. Naff all in the agm report.

Guys. It means nothing. The price was 0.003. Their minimum change is 0.001, so if it goes up at all it is by 33 %. If it then goes back to 0.003 it will be down 25 %. It hops between 0.003 and 0.004 all the time. Gla.

Probably not, but it would be nice if they mentioned that several bids were being considered. Gla.

if anything interesting will come out of the agm overnight ?

Of course you can say what you like. (Up to a point). However you might lose a little credibility if in the space of a few days, to paraphrase (can't be bothered to look up the exact words) you say.
You're gonna make a fortune.
Get out, Cambay is worth bugger all.
Back to you're gonna make a fortune and by the way my account was hacked when I said get out.
So by all means feel free to say what you like.
Atb. Gla.

Got carried away there. Strong buy again.

Unfortunately IIV, after your antics recently nobody will take a word you say seriously. In the space of about 3 weeks you have gone strong buy, strong sell, strong buy, strong sell and now strong sell again. Gla.

Interesting. Thanks Adam. Atb.

Lol.

Hallelujah indeed Adam. Lol.
Tend to forget about Bhandut. Wonder what it's worth ?
Interesting that the mega rampers of last week have disappeared. No doubt they Will reappear as the new deadline approaches. Atb.

Topped up yesterday, almost certainly for the last time. (Never say never. Lol.) So I am reasonably hopeful that by Christmas we will all be happier. However, unless there is some other news (maybe about oz) doubt it will rise much above the low 0.2s before the new deadline at the month end. After all in spite of all the predictions it didn't do a great deal in the days before the last s**t or bust deadline. Atb. Gla.

Must go to specsavers. For a moment I thought I saw a ramp from Jeremy. Lol. Gla.

Thanks Adam. Atb.

Adam. I am a bit confused. Not unusual some might say. If 145 bcf was the target by 2029, why does Gspc's tender document say 18.6 bcf recoverable ? Atb.

I meant Oilex might get a few more % as part of the deal.

Chesh, I am pretty sure that in this context "where" means "in the circumstances that" Gspc sell their stake and not that Oilex can decree where it goes.
However, as Adam says it is perfectly possible that a third party could bid through Oilex and get it cheaper that way. They might then get a bit more that way. All speculation really.

Like so many things tintin, we just don't know. You'd imagine there'd be a minimum acceptable bid defined somewhere.

How about a few more posts requesting clarification ? You never know Joe might respond.
Or maybe he can't for confidentiality reasons. Worth a try ? Gla.