Member Info for GoldGeezer

Banjo - it’s unclear what point you are making. Would you be kind enough to elaborate?

How many other Directorships?

I see no issue with a CEO opening other business entities. It could be a family trust or alternative vehicle necessary to mitigate funds being stolen by the Labour budget. Who wants their wealth passed to undeserving new arrivals?

They’ll obviously not exercise at those prices today, hence their incentive to get the price much higher. If they get to 5-10p, they should exercise them. This is why the criteria for them isn’t as important as the exercise prices.

The incentives have trigger criteria but more important offer prices. They aren’t free and won’t make them money until the price rises above them. 2-3p. Begrudge them making money when an investment today is up 300% min.

They are heavily invested in success. In addition Emma has a very significant holding.

Why would you suggest this. Baseless.

The company required more pads in operation and increased labour. It sounds to me that they are confirming all is going to plan, with a very short period of time before the target production is flowing. Long deadlines often slip. We are getting closer and closer without any negative reports of delays. Just positive updates of progress plus good production. 2.5 months to go, before 1000 ounces a month. The market doesn’t believe however, if announced in January at this price the rerate will be mind blowing.

…. or two weeks 😊

Thanks - distance clear, hence the requirement for the report unnecessary.

Your opinion is solid however not convincing enough for my investment. If my concern was misplaced I’ll have missed out on a much lower entry point. Good luck to the brave. Rewards will be deserved.

I believe your 10km is incorrect, it’s 60km. However, this contradicts your point. The distance means a study has never been required. It’s a six month smoke screen that has been strung out for several years. I’m afraid there’s more to this.

You beat me to it - correct, the message regarding approval was misleading. Not only has it not been approved, it’s counterintuitive to expect a “trial” license to increase to beyond the needs of a full license. It could be the catalyst to a suspension, as likely be approved. Now being the Plan A is the reason I’m not invested. I don’t know the likelihood of success but deduce the full license has failed. My speculation which could be wrong.

I see no reason why SRB can’t update on both plans, regardless if they are repeating themselves. On the contrary, an update promised in May for June was the last mention. Not even discussed in the “interviews”. I believe this is being window dressed for ……

Too little official news on the most important issue. .

Lots of hostility in the room, while the MASSIVE elephant is sat ignored. Incredible. It should how blind the majority of investors are to the risks they take.

Everything is in place to achieve a rapid increase in production, except a license. The license is a prerequisite for the forecasts published today, so to make no statement related to it, it a HUGE alarm bell. Everyone prefers to brush this detail aside, despite the evidence and last the last official related statement is concerning at least.

Ah bless. Read the 6 months report.

Yes, it’s not hard for them to be successful. Lucky to load up while everyone is scared

Apologies 2.606M H1 2024 vs 245k H1 2023

Revenue increase 2.6M vs 245M year on year. 1060%.

You need to get out more. If your aunt had xxxxs, “they” could still be your aunt.

It would seem that no one trusts the very clear short term target being stated. If one invests and it comes true the reward will be spectacular.