I think...16 Sep 2020 18:26
...some people are missing the reasoning behind IOG's original business plan.
As Mole points out, there are many stranded assets and small fields, which the majors and others deemed to be sub- commercial back in the days of manned rigs.
With the proliferation of unmanned rigs, the cost are cut dramatically. This, combined with flexible tie-ins to the major pipelines to Bacton, including our own and others, means that many of the relinquished, unprofitable licences are now viable.
That was IOG's reasoning and even without DELT's assets, which sound promising, (as did Harvey and Skipper), but need proving and developing, there are plenty of targets available. The skill is identifying the ones to pursue.
Personally, I'm of the opinion that we should crack on with our existing plan and if the price is favourable, add the DELT areas to our portfolio for future development.
I agree with the point regarding price. The fact that somebody paid around 3p for 16% of the company has no real bearing other than the fact that he must decide if he is happy to see his investment actually achieve something, or sit on it and wait for a better offer.