Member Info for Goit

'The company is seeking compensation for "unacceptable profits" for 2012-2027, valued at $ 3.5 billion. ' bad translation? lost profits?

All these court cases....does anyone have the remote off the film 'Click' handy...

Regardless, 21,256 million is still a valid number. Someone obviously misread the comma as a decimal

Has anyone tried poking green capital for any information?

Good find -Interesting read. I thought this was also worth noting 'We are set up very firmly to put this field into operation as quickly as possible. We have a GSP-owned stationary drilling rig in the Black Sea. Any other player will need to bring the platform through the Bosphorus, which is about $ 50 million in additional costs and time.'

50 million bucks, some more loose change for Frontera

Also what is this dispute referenced:
'Even in the case of Dolphin, you have had public disputes with the representatives of NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine…

We had no disputes. With Naftogaz, we have harmony and love. I am 100% sure that we will agree with him. there are Ukrgasvydobuvannya managers who are more aggressive. But with Andrei Kobolev we have excellent human relations. And I am sure that it is profitable for both parties to agree. '

Presumably FRR have very good relations with Naftogaz after the 2 year MOU

I'm getting the impression frr are trying to keep anything to do with finances and financial prospects schtum. Given BH's recent listing of their active rig count in Ukraine could they be the ones pushing frr into the Ukraine court action...

Found a potentially/vaguely interesting video of the 'winners' of the Ukraine tender talking about the tender etc from the 13th of August - but I don't have time to watch it. Thought i would post it since its a slow news day and it might have something of interest on fro someone with a bit of spare time. Make sure you press CC on the video for subtitles and go on the options ( the cog button) to change the translation to English:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klgDeuHECg8&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR32gdi9pw-743--GsWiIaWMKPPydM3ZP8pj19DAlSpI4obzwswHeNMWrQg

Ha, I've tried not to filter anyone on the board. I fined it mildly cathartic to release some rage occasionally!

What are you even on about you prat. You're getting more and more confused and not just about your gender. Also Donald Trump was referencing a very violent gang called MS13 before you go spreading more of your BS on the internet - not all Mexicans as you disingenuously put.

Nice find. I like these bits:
'The Georgian government is currently in the midst of implementing a three-year gasification program 2019-2021 that will bring natural gas to households in 226 settlements.'
'Throughout the three-year gasification plan, more than 1.3 million households nationwide will be connected to natural gas – 85% of Georgia’s total consumer population. “At this rate we are the leading country in Europe,” said Turnava. “The gasification plan, which has been discussed and approved by the Georgian government with the involvement of the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development'

Imo for what little it is worth, Hope's lawyers will have phrased it as negatively as they could, as that's part and parcel of the job. The fact it was labelled 'of highly questionable veracity' implies they know it wasn't illegal (at the time of writing) otherwise they would of called it that at the time and its probably based on some unforseen/overlooked technicality on their part.

If you read I did state that it obviously is not a pointless exercise however, Errazel I do not even understand your post so perhaps that why it seems illogical to me on the face of it.

'We hope that the Commission will nevertheless properly consider the results of the tender for the Dolphin site, and the Government of Ukraine will make a final decision on September 12, 2019'
What is frontera implying here? Do we expect to jump from last to first after they 'properly consider' the results? Was the competition really that skewed in their eyes? Honestly on the face of it to us mushrooms, it seems like a pointless exercise - which I assume obviously it is not.

Bit of a negative take/questions that Puddy's post has raised for me - if FTI liquidated frcc put block12 up for sale and paid off all the notes/debts owed would any excess money go to parent FRR company to do as they wish? Eg move into Moldova with all of us trapped as shareholders until they find something worth relisting for?
Are they being pressured by Moldovan government to pull their finger out since we're disputing the Ukraine contract and done very little in Moldova and can't do much more in Georgia currently for whatever reasons?

A potential very positive take (if what Puddy said is true) is that we have left block 12 in (one form or another) the very capable hands of our potential partner/s BH/BP. The fact that zaza stated they didn't wanted to sell block 12, as it would also would involve psa issues, we recently quoted FRR's reserves in the press release which suggests it is still ours and quite frankly MapP's numbers are mind boggling and seems illogical a company in frr's position could command a fair price for the block at this time.
Did the loan amount actually increase significantly because we actually had 2 deals on the table?
Listening back through the October meeting Zaza was really pushing the fact there was going to be a deal imminently with 1 partner and the other was less advanced but that was now 10 months ago - is it really inconceivable that some sort of deal/s couldn't have been conducted through this Web of court charades?
Or.... did the loan increase because a potential partner skidaddled and we had to cover the whole shebang.

Sorry for the rambling and speculations, trapped inside a coffee house on an empty stomach while it rains.

If you read my original post to you I said it was a credible 'theory' but it is arrogant to present it as fact, specially when you cannot back it up with official evidence or otherwise. The reality is we know very little of what has actually been going on and the large majority of predictions and assertions made so far, have been wrong.

Thanks for clarifying you don't have any. I previously had empathy for your side but can now see you're the victim of your own posting - not being bullied at all. Stop playing the victim card.

I think you have me confused with someone else Timster....

You're going off topic again. You said 'we know' as in, it is a fact. People asked for the real evidence to support it. It was a simple request. If you do not have it then just say so.

No I was referencing this: 'We know that they lied in an RNS regarding the interest payments on the loan, we know that the Nomad resigned because they had been lied to, we know they lied to the Californian court and were fined'

I don't think people have issue with positive and negative aspects. They do however have issue with people saying 'we know x, y and z' presented as fact then when asked to show actual evidence proceed to dance round the subject and ask other people for their opinion as if that was somehow an answer. Followed by general ****ging off of the community of the board. Irrespective of whether your speculation presented as fact is plausible, doesn't mean you can act like an arrogant turd then go on the defensive when called out, as you do not indeed, have any facts to present.

Never noticed the (now seemingly obvious) BP name drop at the end of clip 3 being relevant, with them looking for another onshore contract after committing to Azerbaijan for 25 years. Shame this guy didn't record the whole thing start to finish.