Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
happy, you make your statement as if you know there is going to be an announcement soon - have you been in touch with the company ??
that the shares were suspended from trading - hope we get an update soon and it is extremely positive and beneficial for all long waiting PIs. best of luck to us all.
As per their last press release I take it we are hoping for an update next week on timetable approval from the liaison committee? - if they get that then they should be able to publish the timetable in the same release. Any thoughts ?
The proposed work program and timetable targets approval being received from all Liaison Committee members before year end, however the timing will be dependent on feedback from the Liaison Committee and the review and agreement process. The Company is treating this process as a main priority and expects to start the JDA, EPC and O&M processes once agreement is made
AIM chief exec Lofgran breaks ranks to challenge market makers over naked shorts (NTOG)
by ValueTheMarkets • July 31, 2018
He gives the interview on the 31 July 2018 and exactly from that date to now the price has been walked down by 25% (look at the charts) and guess what, new posters start turning up trash talking the company - wonder what their agenda is ??
Absolute crooks the lot of them.
Thanks Ghost - do you think there will be a separate announcement this month regards relist?
Anyone have thoughts on the allocation of an additional 24,133,586 shares ? - thought there would have been something on returning to the market
Anyone have thoughts on the allocation of an additional 24,133,586 shares ? - thought there would have been something on returning to the market
Thanks Ghost - do we know what company will be producing the report?
CPR - meaning Cost Performance Report ???
If they are waiting to announce the 1st quarter results before we hear anything ? If they can re-list on the back of real earnings (hopefully strong) with a plan to improve production and maybe another buy-out in process you would hope that would result in higher/stronger opening and mid-term price, rather then re-listing on the than back of potential projected earnings. Just a thought.
Why doesn't Trew need to repudiate Richards claims and prove to us (shareholders) that there has been real communications between all parties involved, towards a settlement/agreement out of court ? - I don't think there is any NDA's or confidentiality agreements in place - do you ? or has everything been done over the phone ?? Instead he releases a communication that simply states - looks like we are not in discussions anymore so we are we are back to being focused on enforcing the Company's rights through the judicial process. How much dilution has taken place since the potential out of court settlement was communicated by Trew ? I am not happy with them apples, are you ? How many cycles of dilution are you willing to accept as a share holder ?
Are we saying that there is no market rules/regulations that they have breeched to perpetuate their continued issuing of shares and cycle(s) of dilution? i.e. issuing miss-leading or inaccurate press releases
Further to the Company's announcement on 21 March 2018, the Board of Pathfinder Minerals has considered with its legal advisers the email purporting to requisition a general meeting of the Company's shareholders (the "Requisition") and has concluded that the Requisition is not valid. In the event that a valid requisition is served, the Company will comply with its obligations under the Companies Act and will convene a general meeting
Just to put things into perspective, to cover a 170k salary for next 12 months you would have to issue 28,333,333 at 0.6 p. That's 12% dilution without taking into account the cost of placing.
If this is all correct, then it looks as if the shareholders have been used to support some ones lifestyle rather than the operations of our company.
Hi Rich - being a shareholder for quite a few years now, if what you have discovered from last years accounts is correct then this is absolutely disgusting and Trew should be held to account by his shareholders. Taking 170k in Salary from a company that has absolutely no operations and raising this money by continually issuing shares to the market and diluting share price and shareholder value, is certainly not acting in the best interest of the shareholders. Also if he has been embellishing details in press releases to allow him to continually repeat this cycle of dilution to support his salary then we need to know. Please do everything you can to stop him diluting further at levels that are detrimental to existing shareholders and get to the truth of what has actually been happening with negotiations. Thanks
Hi Rich - being a shareholder for quite a few years now, if what you have discovered from last years accounts is correct then this is absolutely disgusting and Trew should be held to account by his shareholders. Taking 170k in Salary from a company that has absolutely no operations and raising this money by continually issuing shares to the market and diluting share price and shareholder value, is certainly not acting in the best interest of the shareholders. Also if he has been embellishing details in press releases to allow him to continually repeat this cycle of dilution to support his salary then we need to know. Please do everything you can to stop him diluting further at levels that are detrimental to existing shareholders and get to the truth of what has actually been happening with negotiations. Thanks
Hi, held NCCL shares for many years now and hope we are now at a positive stage in the process - also just to let you know I work in a heavy engineering sector with a biomass boiler at site (UK) - also deal with GE on regular basis. Our biomass cost in excess of �50 m to build over 2 years and only generates just over 25 MW at max capacity. Maybe gives you a idea of the size of project we are involved in here in NCCL.
based on a rough assessment of asset value, cash and current revenue steams of both companies, with SQZ on a current market cap of �146.34m - what do you think the market CAP of Hague would/should be once re-listed ?
I see we were close on the revenue calculation i.e. Tullow Oil plc reported total revenues of US$31.5 million (�28.5 million) from its Dutch assets in 2016.