Member Info for Gitfinger

No response Mr Adventurous?
It was actually a genuine question.
It actually isn't unreasonable to seek advice from the collective wisdom of the board members, as it can save a load of duplicated effort.
Never mind, as no one seems to want to spill the beans, I thought I'd have a little look, and I see that they are partnered with Siemens, who seem to be doing rather well in placing their fuel cell units out into the market.
Presumably that's why you got a bit cobby, because that little nugget obviously goes against the party line......

Go on then clever boy, enlighten us all......

Does anybody know anything about GeoPura? Re they a competitor, or are they possibly a customer?
The thing is, they were only incorporated in 2019, so either they've got a massive shift on, or they are set up as a vendor of other people's product. It would be interesting to see who....

Oh Shut up!

Now I’m an advocate for free speech, hence my staunch opposition to the evangelical “thou shall not besmirch tha name of AFC” brigade, but come on Garonne and DW
FFS! GIVE IT A REST…….YOU ARE REALLY BEGINNING TO SOUND LIKE PRIVATE FRASER AND ITS STARTING TO SOUND LIKE WHITE NOISE……
Sometimes less really is more…

Athansius
"Don’t worry Gitfinger….I’m fully expecting you derampers to come back at me with your hackneyed sound bites and no sensible facts" was your opening gambit. If you were anticipating a response to the latter part of your post, you would logically have made your point in the first instance, and then followed with your comment about expectation of a response. That would have indicated that you were expecting a future tense response, but by putting the cart before the horse, you have implied that you were anticipating a response to the response to the post made by Escala (past tense) Ergo, the suspicion that you and Escala are one and the same.... Weasel words wont wash, Escala...

Athansius.......did I come back at you? I don't think so, I responded to a post by Escala......
Or am I to surmise that you and Escala are one and the same...not quite sure of the ethics of that personally....

Oh, yes indeed, that’s a whole mountain of jam tomorrow…..problem is, if, how, when…..we’ve been here so many times before that it’s now becoming predictable.

Shame, but you might have a point. They seem to be taking the concept of inbuilt obsolescence to a new level, where the product is obsolete before it even hits the market.

I disagree completely Garonne. He can keep kicking the can down the road indefinitely because all he has to do is keep spinning out his “jam tomorrow” “ someone somewhere might be testing it ( at our expense) spin and the mug punters will keep defending him to the hilt in spite of the evidence ……..all the hold he will be accruing more share options at an ever decreasing exercise price which the apologist will never admit are ring issued at their expense by virtue of the dilutive effect of issuing shares at the prevailing strike price (assuming, of course we ever get to a point where the options ever have any inherent value)

But what do you expect from someone who takes his user name from an animated to show?
Speaks volumes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyLuVOa6SYY

AB the Aussie Leprechaun......maybe he's just tricked HaggisMcHaggis

Talk about grasping at straws............you don't KNOW that "Vodafone directors and/or senior management will have visited Extreme E event(s) and been shown the AFC Fuel Cell system. There's plenty of places in the Vodafone business where AFC Fuel Cells would be a great solution."
You've just made that bit up, like most of the inane drivel you post...............

"One thing is for sure, that these 5 companies have seen the data produced from the Power Tower, they have seen the cost calculations and compared them to the Diesel Gensets they use, they have seen the emissions profile and compared it to the Diesel Gensets thy use, and they will have done their Due Diligence on AFC as a supplier of power systems and fuel, at the end of this extensive scrutiny they have chosen to deploy Power Tower systems for final checks on performance and logistics of fuel supply on their own sites, which speaks massive volumes for AFC and it's product offering, to which the next step would be mass orders by these companies and/or the hire companies they use"

Or alternatively the deployment could just be a gift horse fully delivered at AFC's expense, purely done to bolster failing PR in the absence of anything actually being delivered. The fact is, the statement made by Haggis is pure supposition, and only HIS INTERPRETATION of what may, or may not be going on.
Looks like positive spin is allowed, but anything no adhering to the party line spun out is not allowed.

But I'm only suggesting we do what the happy clappy gang did, and are doing.......or is it one rule for them and another for everyone else?

Anybody interested in setting up a telegram group for those who have concerns about how the company is progressing, so that we can incessantly moan about the CEO remuneration, lack of progress, lack of transparency, whether or not there's even a product, etc. until the cows come home free from the negativity we suffer from the uber optimists?
We can still come on here and post the same stuff, and clog up the board, it's just that we will have our own little invitation only gang........

Even if you did post anything interesting on here, unless it totally 100% accorded with the ramper's agenda, it would be shot down as a bash......

MPO.....Dangerous game you're playing......how very dare you talk sense and apply logic to something when that very sense and logic is at odds with the rampers narrative....you might even get filtered........

Give it up mate, it's like shouting at a wall. The messiah can do no wrong......It's all going swimmingly and next year Rodney.......

All of you happy place residents. One simple question…..what skin to mace, kelt ray, etc. have in the game? A unit has been leased…on what terms…..hydrogen is being supplied…on what terms…..the units are being maintained….on what terms…..
If you were to go and look at a new car that incorporated new technology (example, plug in hybrid) you would realistically want a test drive to make sure it fulfils your requirements……would you agree to either
a. An extended test with no commitment to buy, and at no cost to you, with all running costs met by the dealer
or
b. Lease the car on commercial terms, meeting all running costs personally
My guess is that the things are being lent out on a totally free basis in the dim hope that some orders may be forthcoming….I’m just waiting for my local ford dealer to issue an RNS saying that I’ve been on a test drive….
Now you get why the market isn’t set light y these announcements because there are really only one step away from an MOU which historically has come to nought….
Happy place residents, pin your colours to the mast…..will there be a material sale achieved as a result of the Mace / Keltbray arrangements yes or no? If the answer is yes, and nothing is forthcoming by the end of the calendar year, will you finally admit that the emperor has no clothes? (by material, I mean multiple units sold as capital goods, not extended lease arrangements)