The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Moniman - he’s also been trolling Tremor for 10 years (in its previous incarnations) and has now started to troll Nano on here and ADVFN as a vendetta against some of the Tremor holders.
Hawi - many people have questioned that over the years. He’s moved over to the Nano boards both here and on ADVFN purely as a vendetta against those posters on Tremor. I fear that Sammy may be right and that, like a lot of trolls across different platforms, this is all he’s got in his life and he gets a kick out of it.
There you go again STT1 - using the exact narrative to suit you. 9 months ago TLY were 45p and have since lost nearly 20p off that. I average 19p on Nano so am still laughing at the moment. We can all twist the narrative to suit our own needs. You’ve always done exactly that over the years.
TM58 - people have been asking him the same questions for years on the Tremor board. He doesn’t answer. Just reverts to his MO of restlessness and cutting and pasting. Many people actually thought he was a disgruntled ex member of staff on that board because of how tireless he was!!
TM58 - he is a classic stock basher.
Appears mostly on good news. Posts tirelessly. Cuts and pastes the same things over and over. Retrospectively comes out with “I told you so’s” (eg after 10 years of negativity trying to tell everyone that he was actually a holder and sold the stop right at the top end)
Flying Higher - you are asking people to trust algo generated articles from Simply Wallstreet, when just on Monday you were questioning the Head of Technology at Edison on his personalised email response regarding the Edison Article?
You really are quite the plonker.
Gig - although your approach is much more subtle than that of FH - it's still patently obvious that you have ulterior motives in your posts.
You make steadfast comments to make them sound "entirely obvious" and that stupidity is the order of the day for most posters here. Yet you spent yesterday pushing the agenda that Nano retaining nothing was entirely possible based on the Edison note, which most of us knew, based on all the other evidence, you had mis-interpreted.
Now your narrative has subtly moved to Nano's retention "not being in the £000's millions.
I think you've said enough to lose your credibility - and that of the other 6 dwarves.
“If the email is legit”!! Hahaha - there you go again trying to create doubt. Here’s a hosted screenshot of this makes you feel better…
https://ibb.co/DVxc36Q
How can you have any credibility left when you were trying to use the Edison note to steer your own narrative and present it as fact? They’ve now clarified exactly what they mean. Which all the genuine people on this board already knew.
Why don’t you buzz off?