Member Info for Ginodog

Just checked my trading history and my first Blinkx trade was 13 and a half years ago!

Best of luck to all LTHs!

Yahoo is showing a pre market Nasdaq price of 14.00 - up 38.2%

I’ve been in for well over 10 years since the Blinkx days - some clear light in the tunnel here.

Good luck to all LTHs.

Expecting to see that long term troll STT1 (aka STit) / SikhTheTech appear with his bucket of water soon. As he always does when things starting looking good.

Another article from a Nano LinedIn post earlier this evening….

https://businesscloud.co.uk/news/all-change-at-manchester-spinout-nanoco-as-it-explores-sale/

Sell the IP and trading company. Delist as an R&D business. Give us a few crumbs from the table along the way?

How about the irony of the true inflection point for the business actually being the moment of Brian being shown the door and the reins being taking by someone who actually has experience and contacts in the sector!!!

Troublesome - I’d rather him just lead a trail to getting my money back!

Kooba - says on LinkedIn that he’s lived on three different continents so a move to Runcorn is unlikely to faze him (until he arrives at least! 😂). Another reason to believe that the gig could be relatively short term though!

I tend to agree with this point.

Although, on LinkedIn he specifically calls out “M&A” in his experience. There’s always a chance that he could have been brought in specifically to utilise his network to get the best price (and a nice fat Brucey Bonus) to sell the business.

Given that Nano have stated that they do not know where the materials that they have already supplied to the European customer will end up, who’s to say this won’t be Samsung all over again? Except this time, finding any breach of IP will be like looking for a needle in a haystack. The rationale for serving notice sounds sketchy to me.

Now his co-defendant in the case, Stephen Chamberlain, announced dead after being hit by a car a couple of days ago. I’m not one for conspiracy theories……but I’m also not one for severe coincidences.

Exactly! Bag your stake and it’s all upside. Ignore all the extremely active naysayers - who are panicking and crying into their beer!!

Is that those people coming on here and and continuously bashing the stock expect us to believe that they have motives other than holding a short position! Like people would do it for some kind of wholesome ethical reason to protect others from losing money!! Pull the other one!!!

Ramping is dangerous on these boards, for sure, especially on small market cap shares like this BUT I’ll never be swayed by the idiot doom mongers who clearly have their own motivation. Always DYOR!

You are embarrassing yourself Openheimer. Everyone can see the news from this morning.

I’ve followed up with a request for further information on specifics. Not holding out much hope!

When asked about the sudden halt in buybacks, I’ve had the following response from Liam Gray

“ The authority granted allows Nanoco to buy up to £3m worth of shares through to the next AGM. And we remain committed to that, as we set out in our circular.

Liam”

Enlightening!!!

This is the point that I’d been making previously. There is bound to be low levels of liquidity particularly at this level of SP. All LTHs will not be prepared to sell at 18p if they wouldn’t sell at 24p! And those who did sell at 24p also won’t want to sell now.

Looks like the SP is being held back but there continues to be little liquidity.

I hold another share who have been buying back for a while - every so often there will be a day of no activity. And then the following day they will start buying again. Nothing unusual.

Unlike TGTD I don’t ridicule people of differing opinions. I genuinely don’t know how it will go but I just didn’t believe that the price would drop to 17p given that the holders that are left would have just either turned down 24p or sold at 24p. The share will have 38.5% less liquidity. Who’s going to be selling down below 20p?!

I’m sure he can Troublesome - I just added that reminder as he tried to absolutely ridicule me when I suggested that the SP would be relatively static after the £30m had been spent via the tender.

Troublesome - he predicted 17p after the tender completed.