Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
CEO buys in, recruitment of geologist, CC stands down, positive cash flow and 4 months into a max 6 month permit review. I bought additional last Friday to take my fairly modest holding down to less than a penny. I see significant upside although, by my own admission, I am attached to this share like no other and if I lose its entirely my fault!!
I dislike shareholders using social media to call boards to account, the same people who will rejoice at a rise, one day and within 24 hours scream foul on a fall however this email is quite good. Good luck.
Removing a CEO with so much experience of the hurdles in Slovenian is a bad idea imho
CH going full time is excellent news, cant have a listed stock without a full time CEO, and the fact they now have their own geologist on board bodes very well for Ast. How many aim stocks are generating their own revenue NOW - very few
Completely disagree. Fault lies squarely with Slovenian govt and ARSO, the head of the organisation only recently resigned which kinda says it all. CH has provided the foundation for success only for it to be prohibited by the regulatory system. Long Live CH!!
Ast is where it is now because of a completely ridiculous and not fit for purpose Slovenian govt. whilst the Board probably should of foreseen these events and never invested in Slovenian one cant fully blame them for external events. Slovenian should be booted out of the EU!
Do not contemplate it. Whilst our politicians are determined to bring the country to economic chaos the Slovenian politicians are determined to prevent foreign investment. 5 years for a permit is, on a global scale, horrendous and the Muppets are still dragging it out. Granted or decline - its that simple!
The offensive emails must of come from AST shareholders because only ast holders would have the motivation to act in such a way - no one else would bother. As much as its hurting my own position I do not blame the Slovenians for delaying and sending a message to the British that intimidation tactics are not welcome.
.5m in the bank and generating cash flow to so liquidity better than most AIM listed entities. Besides, AIM stocks are never valued on liquid metrics, if they were most would be worthless. Its all about sentiment and with permits under review this might swing in Ast favour anytime
The shareholders who vetoed additional fund raising are to blame for decline in SP, not the board. A stock who has had its financing withdrawn becomes very unattractive to potential investors, new resolution will change all this and we can start to build once again