Member Info for ge0rge123

Danielth

It was I who asked Mary had she added ....albeit not in one to one exchanges so not Marys fault ..

PetePete

You don't come across as being new to this indeed you sound pretty switched on ...Either way Good Luck

PetePete

You don't come across as being new to this indeed you sound pretty switched on ...Either way Good Luck

Some phenomenal volumes listed in trades after COB most unknown

Am waiting to see if mines listed as an "Unknown" too

Is that I Roofer as one cannot recall making a prediction on Vod...One rather thought it was an outrageous guess at Rolls Royce.

I have however just added to my ridiculous holding with Vod rather in the hope that Bid Speculation is widely covered in the press over the weekend ...otherwise I fancy the demise in the SP could continue

Hey Mary

Did you add

I mean how far can you drive an Sp so low.

Vods reception by far the best I've ever experienced and I've had mobiles since pontius was a pilot

If this goes to anywhere else but the UK an RR it will be like when the Tory Govt awarded the printing of our Bank Notes outside of the UK .

This hit DE LA RUE very hard and us shareholder's with it

Then added at 74,85,105, 137, trimmed...then added at 102, 115, 153, 193,235 then trimmed and added at 275, 324 then trimmed and whoa sold out today at 364.63...

If only Henekin ?????

In the hope of buying back tomorrow ?

322.75

Phenomenal post their Mr DT.. makes so much sense..

Is it me ....as I struggle with what these RNS forms are all about sometimes

But is it Finance houses jumping on the bandwagon here speculating that the SP will go higher because of the potential Bidding War....

Also think that Mr Ashley bought around this level and he wont want to sell at this level

66.35 for me please

Thanks

Isn't " Brings to a Conclusion " the Operative words in respective of Petrofacs involvement....

And as that beautiful song in the film "The Sunshines down on Leith "....

It's Over and Done with it's Over and Done with!!

That PFC will have to have put processes in place that would have been scrutinised by the appropriate authorities. To demonstrate that everything reasonably practical is in place to stop mal business practice from happening in the future.

These cases are from the past and prior to the PFC investigation and fines being paid by the company. The case is closed and cannot be reopened surly can it ?

Thanks for coming back to me here Johnny.

I know what you mean..am just concerned that once again a great deal of PFCs header "Subject Matter" are negative for Investors. (particularly this mornings )

Your response does however make a great deal of sense an again I thank you for that

ATB

Good look with your trading

Kind regards

George

Apologies if subject matter seems direct but I've asked Johnny a question but thought he may not see

Hi Johnny

I may stand to be corrected but thought you were Long PFC.

I've read with intrest all your posts regarding the TR1 timing and regulations and clearly your a clever guy with your finger On the ball

Communicating with PFC I.R. is one thing together with your opinion as to there response

Reporting this to the FCA however is another. How do you think that Shareholders can benefit from this? ..

For me as a shareholder I want PFC focusing fully on their work in progress

Hopefully you won't take this the wrong way ?

G

The 394k sell offset by a 204k buy and a few other 000's buys....

Presumably the shorters hard at it with there Team leaders looking over there shoulders...

Uncle Doug

Yes indeed I tend to agree with you as it bounced off 110 very quickly...Come on Unilever...but not at 62p surely