Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
"Who's fault is it that? It's the fickle PI's own fault, that's who"
Well I've read some nonsense on this BB over the years, but congratulations for the most inane statement ever. You're actually blaming the lack of take up on PI's? If the company had structured it right it would have been better received. We PI's don't get the benefit of the presentation made to II's, we have to make the decision based on what's in the public domain, no winks and nudges for us. And then we have to choose to subscribe even though we could buy cheaper at the click of a mouse. To even suggest that the fund raise wasn't successful was because of fickle PI's is simply laughable
Many on here think you're a fool, but you've now proved it to the rest of us
"they had their chance of cheap stock and many blew the chance, as such they should not be given a second chance"
But they weren't cheap, you could actually buy for less on the open market. PI's shunned the offer because there was no incentive to buy directly from the company. It was poorly packaged, there should have been some incentives added such as warrants, hence why it was not very well supported
Hf14 "It must be very frustrating for MSC as they have been ready to start this trial for a number of months."
How do you know that? The last information we had was that the trials are expected to commence in Q1 2024 provided the relevant permits are received in time. Have all the permits been issued?
Hf14 "If they do the costs of an open offer will be more than the proceeds. They only had 38% last time and that included excess shares taken up."
I believe they structured the offer wrongly last time, there was no incentive to buy shares through the offer than on the open market, (other than directly supporting the company). I'm sure the take up would have been much higher if they'd attached some meaningful warrants. If they need to raise again, I hope they've learned a few lessons and will structure it in a way that is more attractive to existing holders
Pigfase "Theirs always a few who try to put other down ,as i suffer from dyslexia sometimes get sentences wrong. "
I think it's short term memory loss, as you seem to have forgotten all the snidey posts you make about the LTH's here. Funny how the ones having a pop, cry foul when it's directed back at them. Actually no, not funny, PATHETIC 🙄
"I'm as qualified as you Fyoz"
Undeniably, but I'm not advising people to wait for an RNS
"here's my brass neck - I have the margin to make that choice and the right to post here!"
Undeniable again, but I asked you if you think you're qualified to advise potential investors, which you're clearly not
"
As I'm not currently invested you might think why am I posting ? Well there's going to be folk out there who think this is going somewhere NOW but I would say wait a bit for that all important RNS because without it you will be joining a long list of victims who get attracted to the QFI / QED dream and find that the MMs don't agree the next day and the day after that etc etc."
So you lost money with QED but you think you're qualified to offer advice to potential investors?
The sheer brass neck of some people . . .
Any kind of sustainable contract will return us to double figure IMO. We'd be greatly derisked by it, and new investors will begin to see the possibilities. A decent contract with MSC will blow this SP out of the water. The future potential for our process is still mind boggling when you consider marine, power generation, industrial heating, tar sands refining etc
Illuminate33 "Exciting times for QED!"
Absolutely, 3 projects still on the go, yet the Chicken Little's on here would have you believe the opposite is true. Not trading this by any chance are you 'doomsters'?
HF14 12th Oct "The SP now needs a 90% rise to get back to the open offer price. "
Today "The SP currently needs a 67% increase to get to the open offer price. "
So a 13% improvement, hooray, thanks for the positive post for a change, except that you didn't intend it to be did you?
ColinH100 "If the Maersk trial was successful why did they bring it to a conclusion with some ridiculous nonsense about a collision with a marker buoy?"
It was a successful trial of the fuel:-
“During the MSAR® trial programme Maersk has enjoyed a close and professional collaboration
with our technology partner QFI and supply partner Cepsa, resulting in a smooth operation
during which the MSAR® fuel has performed well.”
Niels H Bruus
Head of Future Solutions of Maersk Line A/S
For the sake of newer investors, the following statement is, yet again, untrue:-
"as the Maersk trial came to nothing and is history"
The reality is (from the Quadrise case study report) :-
As a result of the successful operational trial, Quadrise received an interim Letter of No Objection
(LONO) for MSAR® for Wärtsilä RT-flex96C-B engines.