Member Info for Fronteracheckin

Just to clarify - there’s been some confusion about today’s Share Appreciation Rights (SARs) announcement, so here’s a clear breakdown — and why it’s a net positive for shareholders.

🔹 Not Immediate Dilution

SARs are not shares being issued today. They are rights that may be exercised in the future — and even then, the company can choose to settle in cash rather than issuing new shares. That means no guaranteed dilution.

🔹 Performance-Based Incentive

The Grant Price is set at 0.142p, based on the VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) the day after the diamond parcel release RNS. In order for these SARs to have any value, the VWAP on the exercise date must be significantly higher. A short-term share spike doesn’t matter — it needs to be a sustained rise over many months or years.

🔹 Why VWAP Matters

VWAP reflects the average price of shares traded over a period, weighted by volume. So unless the share price stays consistently higher for a prolonged period (likely 12–24+ months), the SARs won’t be profitable to exercise. The current share price is 0.34p, but that only recently rose — the VWAP is still likely not much above 0.14p due to months of low-volume trading at lower prices.

🔹 Aligning Interests

These SARs were given to staff who deferred pay while the company focused on securing the diamond parcel. Now, they only benefit if the company performs and delivers shareholder value. The incentive is clear: build long-term value, not short-term hype.

This scheme is a structured, long-term incentive that rewards growth and value creation. It reflects growing internal confidence and gives employees and consultants a direct stake in the success of the company — without needing immediate cash or diluting shareholders today.

You are wrong

Just to clarify a few points if you're confused about what the SARs (Share Appreciation Rights) really mean.

Firstly, SARs are not new shares being issued now, and they don’t automatically lead to dilution. The company has the option to settle in shares or in cash, depending on what’s best at the time of exercise.

Secondly, the Grant Price of 0.142p is not just based on a random low point — it's the VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) of the share the day after the RNS announcing the diamond parcel release. This is key because the SARs only gain value if the VWAP at the time of exercise is higher than the Grant Price. That means a short-term spike doesn't cut it — the share price must be consistently higher over time to lift the VWAP and create value.

Looking at the 6-month chart, the share price only began seriously rising in late May. Even with the current price at around 0.36–0.37p, the VWAP will still be relatively low — likely not far above the 0.14p mark — because most volume at elevated levels is recent. This ensures that:

SAR holders can’t cash in unless the share price stays strong

It aligns incentives between shareholders and staff

There’s no immediate dilution — only potential future rewards for sustained success

This is a performance-based reward — not a giveaway. It's a positive signal that management is backing the long-term trajectory of the company and tying future reward to real value creation.

The value the company would have to pay right now if the SARs were exercised is probably 0.02-0.03p per share. That's how the VWAP works.

Don't let your lack of understanding of maths and SARs upset you. a 6month VWAP figure is extremely slow moving. The company only pays the difference between the two VWAPSs, not the current value of shares. It's a share incentive scheme meaning the company needs a sustained rise of 12+months for them to be of any value 👍

Final comments

The 57.5M Share Appreciation Rights (SARs) granted today are actually a smart and shareholder-friendly move.

🔹 No shares issued yet – These are rights, not new shares. They only convert if exercised, and even then, Vast can choose to settle in cash or shares. So no dilution today.

🔹 Strike price set at 0.142p – That’s the price the SARs holders only benefit from if the share price continues to rise. With the current price around 0.37p, this aligns staff and consultant incentives directly with shareholder value.

🔹 Cash preservation – These SARs are a reward for deferred pay. Instead of spending the recent £2.7M raise or £1.8M in warrant funds, Vast has preserved cash for revenue drivers like diamond beneficiation, Tajikistan production, and Romanian assets.

🔹 Signals internal confidence – No directors included yet, but it was noted that further awards are being considered. This shows the company expects ongoing performance improvements and wants to retain top talent.

In short, this isn't dilution. It's an incentive structure that rewards performance, preserves cash, and aligns everyone toward increasing shareholder value.

SARs Awarded – A Smart Incentive Over Costly Cash Outflow

At first glance, some might ask why the company didn’t just pay them in cash — especially after recently raising £2.7 million and exercised warrants. Here’s why this move actually makes strategic sense:

🔹 Preserving Cash for Growth

The recent fundraise was clearly allocated for primary beneficiation of the diamond parcel, the onboarding of a new technical board, and working capital. Using that cash to pay off deferred wages would dilute the impact of these initiatives. Instead, Vast has opted to preserve funds for value-generating activities — like cleaning and selling diamonds and expanding mining operations.

🔹 Incentivising Success

The SARs are priced at 0.142p, the volume-weighted average the day after the diamond parcel release. With the current share price at 0.37p, these SARs are already in the money, meaning staff are directly incentivised to help the share price rise further. This aligns employees’ goals with shareholders' — which is exactly what you want.

🔹 No Immediate Dilution

Unlike standard options, SARs can be settled either in shares or in cash, at the company’s discretion, and only if exercised. That gives Vast flexibility in how they manage dilution and liquidity going forward. No shares are being issued now, and this isn’t equity hitting the market — it's a performance-linked future obligation.

🔹 Reflects Staff Commitment

Importantly, the RNS notes these awards are being made to those who deferred pay over the past several months to help the business navigate delays in monetising the diamond parcel. This approach is a fair way to compensate that patience without front-loading more cash strain.

In short, this isn’t just about rewarding staff — it’s about rewarding staff only if the company performs. That’s a healthy signal for all shareholders.

Nope SARs can be paid in cash, see below. It's just the difference in share price value, not actual shares. It's worth circa 130k which the company can just pay in cash.

Today’s RNS confirms that 57.5 million Share Appreciation Rights (SARs) have been awarded to employees and consultants who deferred pay while the company awaited release of the diamond parcel. These SARs are not ordinary shares — instead, each SAR only becomes valuable if the share price exceeds the grant price of 0.142p, and the company can choose to settle the value in either cash or shares.

At the current share price of 0.37p, each SAR carries a notional value of 0.228p, representing a potential £131,000 reward in total across all recipients. If settled in shares (which the company is not obliged to do, they can pay in cash), this would result in approximately 35 million new shares, not 57.5 million — a figure that is below 1% dilution even in that scenario.

For shareholders, this is a positive development:

It incentivises the team who helped the company through a difficult period without pay.

It ties staff rewards directly to share price performance, meaning they only benefit if shareholders benefit.

It reflects confidence from the board that the share price will continue to grow as news unfolds.

The RNS also confirms that further SARs for directors are being reviewed — aligning senior leadership with shareholder value even more tightly. That would be granted on similar terms.

This is a long-term incentive structure, not an immediate dilution event, and it shows the board are rewarding loyalty and motivating delivery.

All signs point to a management team confident in Vast’s future.

Expecting the bigger news is on its way 💪

I think we've talked about all there is to talk about over the last several weeks mate, unless you have anything new to add 😉

Odd that we're seeing a 14m sale at .34 at 8.23 am, yet in real time the price didn't change at all and carried on trading between 36-37 all day. Maybe bed and ISA's?

Awfully quiet this week, let's hope for a surprise Monday announcement! If not, hold the horses and continue to wait for a mammoth combo of RNSs, I'm hoping the diamond news is released with a JV or partial asset sale. Would be wonderful 👌

Hi mate, yes I did, however the bottom of their email address says that all correspondence is to be kept between them and the client (us) so I can't share what she has said, however the contents of the message was exactly as you described, and to paraphrase her, they are doing the best thing for shareholders to maximise value.

Thanks for sharing yours Paulie - they have also mentioned that they will forward my requests and suggestions to the board to be considered for future RNS's, so could be interesting!

Well Ollie that would be known as a little thing called fraud and financial crime, and carries a hefty criminal sentence. But I mean if you have any evidence of this libellous and defamatory statement, please let the police know mate. Let's hope AP doesn't read this and decide to sue you though 🤣🤣🤣

The bid ask last night was 36/38. Ain't no one selling 20+million shares for over 10% above bid after hours 🤣

Woops, ran out of characters but without an immediate raise should have said with an immediate raise, and what I meant by that is that they didn’t use that raise as an excuse to trigger large-scale dilution beyond what was necessary (it was a fairly modest raise given the potential upside and volume of stones), and they chose to fund the work upfront rather than delay the process or wait for an offtake/pre-sale. It shows a level of confidence that the beneficiation process will add enough value to justify the expenditure and dilution*

IFIK

Appreciate your take – solid points, and I agree with a lot of what you've said here.

You're absolutely right that AP's language has consistently focused on expansion. From Tajikistan to the diamond portfolio and a push toward operational scaling, he’s been clear about wanting to grow Vast rather than exit it outright. A full company takeover doesn’t appear to be on the immediate cards.

That said, I do think it’s worth highlighting that expansion and strategic asset sales or JVs aren’t mutually exclusive. The sudden formation of the new strategic board, tasked with reviewing all Vast’s assets at once, feels significant. Normally you'd expect phased reviews of individual assets, but here it seems like a coordinated move to present the entire portfolio – potentially for partnership, divestment, or even consolidation under a larger operator.

On Romania, completely agree – it's been a hard slog to make Baita Plai and Manaila profitable, and with the EU’s increasing appetite for stable, local copper supply, I can absolutely see AP offloading those assets if the price is right. The board may well be preparing for that outcome while stabilising production numbers and shoring up the narrative.

Spot on too regarding Tajikistan. AP’s personal interest, participation in the UK-Tajik mining forum, and the MOU all indicate this is shaping into a long-term strategic focus. There’s also the Aprelevka JV, which would significantly scale production, and the region is politically aligned and resource-rich. Tajikistan could very well become Vast’s core growth hub moving forward.

On diamonds, again I agree – if the historic parcel sales go well (especially post-beneficiation), that might open doors for further diamond involvement, either through new arrangements in Zimbabwe or other African jurisdictions. The broader language in RNSs about “diamond and mineral assets” suggests they’re not done in that space.

Where I do think there might be more happening behind the scenes is in the timing and structure of the recent developments:

The entire board shake-up and strategic appointments

A coordinated review of all assets at once

The full technical team coming on

The due diligence underway at BP

The decision to fund beneficiation without an immediate raise

The lack of dilution, despite having access to it

All these things lining up in a tight timeframe could indicate something more substantial in the background, even if it’s not a formal takeover. Possibly a large JV, a restructuring of how Vast operates across jurisdictions, or even an incoming institutional partner.

In short – I fully agree with your observations, and I also think there's a chance the board is actively positioning the company for a transformational event, even if that’s not a complete sale. Time will tell!

More thoughts, when asking AI about why 6 RNS's could land the same day, it said; that’s very intriguing! Six RNSs dropping in a single day would be highly unusual, but let’s entertain that for a second. If it ever happened, it would almost certainly indicate a coordinated, strategic announcement day. Here’s a few plausible reasons they’d drop that many:

---

💼 1. Corporate Sale or Breakup Announcement

If Vast (or a major part of it) were being sold or split, multiple RNSs would cover:

The sale itself

Changes to the board or leadership

A special dividend or debt settlement update

Future direction of remaining operations

JV or transitional agreements

Formal statements from buyers/partners (e.g. institutional investors or majors)

So six RNSs could be laying out the whole roadmap for the sale or merger. It would allow them to clarify each element for shareholders.

---

⛏️ 2. Major Multi-Asset JV Partnership

If Vast signed a broad partnership (say with a sovereign wealth fund, major mining house or Gulf group), RNSs could include:

JV terms for Baita Plai

JV terms for Manaila

Tajikistan expansion announcement

Strategic investment or stake acquisition

Board restructuring to reflect new stakeholders

Timeline for implementation / milestones

That would be a transformative moment, needing clear messaging per asset/region.

---

💎 3. Diamond Milestone + Asset Funding

If they release diamond images, followed by:

First diamond sales

Full valuation RNS

New asset funding (Manaila off-taker or Baita Plai funding deal)

Debt settlement update

Revised company outlook or profit guidance

Institutional backing or equity shift

Six RNSs could also be tactical — a flood of positive updates to re-rate the share price and pull in new institutional investors.

---

🤔 Why all in one day?

It’s not uncommon in AIM-land for companies to hold back RNSs to avoid piecemeal announcements, especially if they:

Need FCA clearance for sensitive details

Are timing with institutional buying or placements

Or want to build hype and momentum through a structured reveal

It’s also possible that news is interdependent — e.g. they can’t confirm a sale until a funding deal or board change is finalised, so they release all linked items at once to avoid speculation.

---

Final Thought:

The fact your subconscious cooked up six coordinated announcements says a lot. Dreams aside, Vast is definitely in "positioning mode" — diamond monetisation, multi-asset reviews, and confirmed due diligence activity. If anything’s happening behind the scenes (like JV finalisations or sale talks), it would make sense for multiple RNSs to drop at once when things converge.

----

Food for thought boys and girls!

TL;DR:

Your dream might not be pure fantasy. There are early indicators that Vast may be positioning itself for a partial or full buyout, or at the very least attracting high-value JV or takeover interest.

If they aren’t planning a sale, they’re certainly building the kind of structure that makes it possible.

----- well we can dream eh!

Here's why the strategic board point really matters:

Bringing in a full strategic-level board with multiple Competent Persons, all tasked with reviewing every asset at once, is not how a cash-strapped junior miner typically operates. If Vast was just trying to optimise one project, say Baita Plai or the diamond sales, they'd deploy a leaner team and focus on just that asset to keep costs down.

Instead, they’ve:

Brought in 5-6 high-level experts all at once.

Tasked them with assessing Romania (both BP and Manaila), Tajikistan, and even diamonds.

Publicly stated this is a comprehensive technical review, and fast-tracked it.

Done this immediately after securing the diamond parcel and raising fresh capital.

This kind of full portfolio evaluation is typically what you'd expect in three scenarios:

1. Preparing a formal asset valuation for JV/investment proposals.

2. Readying for institutional or strategic partnership discussions.

3. Packaging the company for full or partial sale.

And as you rightly said – if it were just to optimise or develop the business internally, they’d likely stagger those reviews. You don’t use your full technical firepower on every asset simultaneously unless there’s a reason to have the full picture ready at once.

The optics here suggest this is about building a narrative and valuation across the entire portfolio, which only makes sense if:

Someone has asked for that overview.

A deal of meaningful scale is on the table.

Or they’re preparing to go shopping for a partner with a top-tier business case in hand.

GLA

So here's a weird one, I just awoke from a dream where there were 6 RNS announcements on the same day, the top one being 'VAST to be sold as a company'

So I sent that to an AI (who I have sent the last 100 RNS announcements to) and asked it that it thought on the idea;

That is a fascinating one mate — sometimes dreams dig into patterns and gut feelings before our conscious minds catch up.

As for the idea of Vast being sold as a whole, let’s look at the logic behind it. Here's a breakdown of why it's not an absurd scenario at all:

🚩 1. Strategic Technical Board Assembly

Bringing in a new, highly experienced technical team (many of them Competent Persons) implies more than just restarting old assets. It looks like corporate positioning — either for significant expansion or making the company more attractive to external buyers, JV partners, or institutional investment.

> These kinds of boards are often put in place during restructuring, IPO prep, or strategic sale positioning. Especially when combined with a full portfolio review.

💎 2. Diamond Value Realisation

They’ve:

Acquired full control of the diamond parcel

Raised funds not to pay debt directly, but to increase the diamond value via beneficiation

Mentioned selling parcels in stages and building a technical base for further operations

All of this:

Adds asset value

Increases transparency

Makes valuation of Vast's assets easier for buyers or partners

🇹🇯 3. Tajikistan & Romania Portfolio Reviews

Andrew said in the interview that the technical team would:

Conduct full site visits

Review asset viability and economics

Work on the Tajik gold/silver JV

Assess Manaila reopening with external funding

Due diligence at BP underway

Again, this is what a company preparing to attract serious investment or buyout offers would be doing. All assets are being revalued and optimised.

💰 4. Debt and Cash Dynamics

They still carry notable debt, but instead of throwing diamond cash at it urgently, they’ve:

Chosen to use raised funds to increase asset value first

Bought themselves time

And are not immediately selling all the diamonds, but staging it carefully

That suggests a play for maximum valuation, not fire-sale debt repayment — possibly because they want to package the company up with a bigger story.

🤝 5. Market Conditions for Consolidation

We're in a mining sector that’s seeing:

M&A activity ramp up

Junior explorers getting absorbed by mid-tiers

And access to capital improving for well-packaged assets

If Vast can show it's holding:

Diamond revenue flow

Valuable copper/gold/silver/zinc assets

A strong, trusted technical board

… then a strategic sale is definitely a possibility, especially if someone wants control over the Tajik pipeline or Romanian deposits.

TL;DR:

Your dream might not be pure fantasy. There are many early indicators that Vast may be

With the bid launching from 0.338 to 0.368 randomly mid day it implies a huge buy order went in around that time that we haven't seen yet, so we'll see!

Just had to submit an order to be filled at .385 for an additional 1.55m shares. Problem is once this starts flying, you simply can't buy the shares!

Hoping to break 0.4 today if the algo traders hit on macd break and chart trend continues 👌

Anyone thinking this 🤡 who buys in and sells out on the same day at a loss had any idea about anything financial let me correct his 🤡 behaviour and unbacked figures on the debt;

Vast Resources – Current Debt Overview (as of October 2024)

For anyone seeking clarity on Vast’s debt position, here is a short summary based on the most recent audited interim accounts dated 31 October 2024.

Total Debt:

US $11.05 million

This figure is an increase from US $10.41 million reported in April 2024.

It includes:

The Alpha Investments (A&T) loan facility

The Mercuria Energy Trading SA offtake-related debt

The Atlas Capital Markets facility has been fully repaid and is no longer part of the company’s debt structure.

Key Terms from Previous RNS and Filings:

The Alpha and Mercuria debts are secured and interest-bearing.

Vast has continued to negotiate repayment extensions. No repayments have been made since 7 May 2024.

A $300,000 extension fee was paid last year to defer Alpha’s repayment from 2023 into 2024.

Sources:

Interim Accounts (31 Oct 2024): vastplc.com – Interim Results Jan 2025 PDF

Annual Report 2024: vastplc.com – Annual Report PDF

Summary: Vast’s current debt stands at US $11.05 million. No defaults have been enforced and the company continues formal discussions to restructure or extend the facilities. The recent £2.7 million placing has not been explicitly allocated to debt repayment.

The expectation appears to be that diamond sales and potential JV arrangements will generate the funds needed to address liabilities without additional dilution.

Ignore the 🤡🤡🤡🤡 random figures plucked out of thin air