Member Info for FreeTheCaterham7

Dunk
It has indeed done all those things.
It hasn't made much progress though.

There was a lot of dot joining going on just before the SPRINTER results.

"We will get H1 financial results before then, which will be quite positive."

Let’s hope so

Kurzgesagt

"I’d rather read something new and informative than your endless rants about RM, employees and emailing the company, which are boringly repetitive."

More relevant though, I think

"Our independent peer-reviewed Medicom Conference Reports are made
possible by sponsoring."

I wouldn't bother sending it to Brooke. She probably paid for it.

This is quite a good one. Higher risk than some, but potentially high returns.

"They still struggling to prop up collapsed Stopes and burning money like you wouldn't believe"
Evidence please

Up to 36p, back down to 29.5p within 3 days.
Getting on a platform trial will make a difference though

In this market it will take more than one month's positive production figures to drive any material share price rise

"Hindsight is a wonderful thing"
It is. However, some of us, including me, were urging the company to hedge at least part of production while copper was on the way up.

Well I imagine SNG001 could be one.

Hi @Graham201986. Docdaneeka is right, there’s nothing in this connecting SNG001 to STRIVE. I think there’s a good chance we’ll be on it, but there’s nothing in this job description to link us with it.

As far as I am aware the company has not announced any new hedge while it was bouncing along at or just below 4.75.
If indeed they have not put any hedge in place they have made a mistake.
Some of us were calling for them to at least partially hedge as copper rallied sharply. Failing to do so is taking a serious and unnecessary risk.

Thanks for the report gents.
In my previous career I used to go to quite a few company presentations. They are always jolly compelling. But from what you say, it sounds to me as though it’s worth hanging on here to see if something can be salvaged .

"Now they say a small number of shareholders, but a small number of individual shareholders can have lots of shares. So perhaps Polygon?"

Yes, I'd have thought definitely Polygon.

It's just an old order that never got filled.
Once all the MMs are open you'll see the real price.

I didn't think we were an oral protease inhibitor

The ones that amuse me most are the ones that state something with certainty, and then turn out to be completely wrong.

Why?