Member Info for Fredd1eboy

If you get your way...the only news we will get will be bad news ...so just go away and enjoy the sun now your 8 to 5pm job is done

You are both clueless so stop trying to support your argument which is incorrect . The shareholders own shares in a company. They have no control over its assets except indirectly and in some siuations only. The judgement has been made many times over. If you wish to continue with your stupid posts then correct them as otherwise you are misleading shareholders whilst considering which way to vote....Facts please not ******s continued drivellllll

1/10.. Must try harder

Youre on the wrong planet mate..

So following your logic all suppliers to the company are owned by the shareholders.....get a grip toserk...you are losing the plot

For **** sake get your facts right toserk....the boar is employed by the company, not the shareholders.... Asfor the rest of your crap, I really havent the patience....

Please be reminded...Shareholders will be given the opportunity to participate in future fund raising initiatives!

Should have added that cannot be blocked though!

Agreed....it has to be justified each time?
Thats reasonable.

...watch the marathon tennis... Less boring

Spot on Woody...I am certain any potential partner will wish to be assured valirx remains solvent...who knows what the sp will be when they actually use the facility. We are so close. It all depends on good news. Hopefully to come. Best wishes and have a good weekend. Freddie

Not so sparse now

....Could this be the lull before the perfect storm... Delivering a recovery and value added.. I live in hope...

Well said woody

No flipsome you are 100% incorrect ...We have been advised negotiations are underway...An NDA is always put in place for obvious reasons....Well clearly, not too obvious to you. Trust me I have spent a career working within confidentiality agreements. No, I guess you dont even want to accept you are wrong. Wonder why....cheap stock or ludite mentality...please confirm which..

Cannot fault your last post flipsome...but if that is what you wish..you have a very negative way of forcing through your arguement...over and over again...commencing with pushing for news when clearly none can be issued and dismissing partnership discussion/negotiations etc etc etc..

That would be telling valJu..and feed one or two trolls on this boeard...needless to say I have 3m valirx shares at an average of under 4p..all other investments are tied up. I sincerely hope the science proves out and treaments come to market quickly, hastened through jv's

Join the club flipsome....banks 10 years ago 80% down, Angel 100%, intercytex 100%, Reneuron 80 % down. Dont wish for val to go 100% down through unnecessary no vote.

Balanced reasoned argument eitherway tozerk...appreciated..from what you initially stated Im guessing your voting yes?
I have....beat wishes. Freddie

A no vote would force val into administration and we will all lose our investment. ..they need cash and certainty of future funding for a deal.. .