Jimzi8 Oct 2019 00:35
I have no delusions over PF’s capacity to influence timescales. He has none. That’s self evident.
But the dispute twixt MPS and GPHA pre-dates all of PF’s published timescale expectations. It appears unresolved if Big’s post accurately describes an ongoing impasse that has existed throughout. As a result, (if so) none of them have been close.
I understand he’s not directly involved - but will be kept abreast of developments as they occur. Shareholders rely on him to convey the position, as reliably as possible. That’s my grouse - I don’t believe that virtually every project we’ve pursued has been a constant curve ball. If they are, he may as well say nowt, on the grounds that it’s all subject to unforeseen, but predictable delay. Because everything IS delayed. ‘No point in reading RNS’s. Let alone bullish decoding that might suggest a nudge or wink. Delays don’t discriminate.
This isn’t deramping. The Groups RNS’s document expectation, followed by disappointment for years.
The list of un-met expectation is endless. Their judgement can’t be so consistently woeful, surely?
Soon. Last few issues, standby, imminent, fit for purpose, at least, 30 days, end Sept, coming weeks and several cusps, that weren’t.
The legacy of that output is default disbelief, and despite RNS’d activity, SL & fulfilling our function in Ghana, an SP at sub nominal, in stasis.
I’d just like to read an RNS that actually transpired.
Too much to ask?