Member Info for Foxhill

Mixing up your negativity with your realistics.

But thanks for pointing out that it’s a ‘lifetime’ since WSG closed an MSc.

Source for a reasonable grouse I’d have thought?

That all those round number sells realise that if you’re not in then you’re out. I wonder if there are 375,000 of them. Looks like a new trend (wtfdik).

Could have been a good thing.

Ironic for me that PF suggested wryly that the market didn’t understand and as such WSG was undervalued - on top of his previous wouldn’t sell for £2. And that on top of the inference that if a raise was necessary it might be at a figure than was the case when being interviewed.

For a CEO sitting on an implied (not his words) contract and with several cusps in hand - to raise at 10p and gift warrants at 12.5p conflicts for me.

It’s the price of the warrants, given the boards report of so much work in progress that is the problem.

What were the last options? 13p? Not exactly challenging eh? With so many, many opportunities.

What was it in those interviews that investors might look forward to in the next six months...

What occurred?

Could, will, might. Plenty that could happen - but, historically, never does..

Similar inferences 2016.

When was the last time we repaid anything early?

‘Won’t learn anything from me - I’m a left-leaning effeminate moron.

Welcome. ;-)

I concur. I don’t think Tema is priced in - but on it’s own - where it is - in the absence of numbers - and with the drag of cheap options/warrants in abundance - the SP action on signing will be anti-climactic. It’s not really news anymore.

I squinted at my phone this morning, before sweeping the bed for reading glasses - and thought I read 18.47p. (13.47) ‘Assumed an RNS had landed for a moment, and thought it might be about as good as the Tema effect will get after two hours or so of trading, come the day.

I think they’ll need at least two or three additional such contracts to get anywhere near most LTH targets. Then it depends if you can face the teeth pulling nature of contract negs at WSG.

:-)

I don’t think I post negatively :-). Realistically, yes.

Anyway, cusps ahoy.

If 9/11 didn’t have the desired effect - this scrap isn’t either

WSG has been a security company for a while now. During that period security has come under increasing focus, Paris, Nice, Tunisia, Egypt, etc,,etc. It’s had no noticeable bearing on business written or commitment demonstrated.

I see no reason why it would now. Clutching at straws.

Be nice if it galvanised the two contracts in limbo.

Who says I only just read it?

The history, which you’re happier to dismiss, answers (in my view) your present quandary as to why ‘formality’ hasn’t had the impact that it should have done.

Anyway, I am going out, genuinely.

Not personal.

Apologies.

Big ears eloquent summary let’s them off one call. 30 days. And that assumes they had no knowledge/concerns about a dispute that has gone on since MPS landed, probably.

They then went on to make two more poor calls.

And that’s just Tema.

What’s the excuse for all the others?

Fcuk patience!! ;-)

On Monday probably!! ;-)

Jimzi. We go over this point again and again. Hence, I suspect, Vanders myopic jibe.

PF is in the hot seat every day. We rely on him, the board and Nomad for an accurate version of where the business is. Their calls on timescale are legendary. Soon, imminent, standby, post contract, 30 days, coming weeks, end Sept’. Not to mention previous targets - 2015, at least and cusps.
And two ferry launches!! That didn’t.

How can they get it SO wrong, SO consistently. It suggests that there isn’t a very realistic grasp of client readiness/motivation/commitment - at best?

Is that unreasonable?

And you genuinely wonder why ‘formality’ isn’t taken seriously?

No, he can’t unilaterally sign contracts. That’s an absurd remark. But how about being able to rely on them getting a timescale ‘call’ right. It’d be just the once in 8 years - ‘would work for me.

I think Tema will happen. F’knows when.

I also think that if anyone has the temerity at the AFM, they’ll be able to ask PF what he understands ‘cusp’ to mean.

Hope I’m wrong, because I think this needs a couple of MSC’s to pitch up for some LTH’s to recover losses - given the dilution inflicted.

In ‘18, when it was imminent....

What are the chances, after all of those opportunities, that we semi-sign it within days of Trumps withdrawal? On top of that we started a new trend. Failure to exchange board letters - or whatever it was - permitting a tactical withdrawal (sorry, hold) of our own.

Subsequently semi-sign Africa. What Africa!!?

And go all implied in Ghana (Jimzi’s interpretation).

In 2017, when we were in funds, courtesy of Darwin, for anticipated post contract expenditure.

I think he should have signed it in 2016 once those last few issues were resolved.