RE: Today18 Jul 2025 09:11
Addicknt, I understand your sentiment regards current valuation being zero on the exploration assets... but lets be clear here... that's the markets view and lets face it ... the market couldn't value a chocolate fireguard properly could it?
When it comes to valuation, the first look would be to the accounts. What 'value' is on the books for Porvenir et al? What's booked? Any float of those assets is either going to bring in a 'profit' on the accounts or a 'loss' based on booked value. Bear in mind, Porvenir has had around $20m+ spent on it from what I gather possible more. Then there's the ongoing cost of those assets over the last 10 years+ of holding them to factor in.
Look around on ASX for look alike assets to Porvenir and I think you'll find a few out there around the $300m market cap! That index sees mining values better. Much better than LSE. Remember, Porvenir ranks in the 20 discoveries over last decade I believe!
I think the North / South folio divide certainly leans toward an acknowledgement that Porvenir (being in south) as more merits/weight than anything else in the folio. I don't think they could float them as separate IPO's as the north doesn't really have a cornerstone asset like Porvenir (apart from Alpala of course).
I suspect the structure of the exploco being south vs north will be set up in a way which allows the south to be sold but north asset retained. We'll see. But first we need Gina R's suits to put Noboa's gang back in their box. I fancy there might be a compromise deal to save face done. Although there already appears to be some unpicking of the blanket approach as small miners have to end of the year to pay up and medium to large players have till end of this month. I do hope we fit into the small miners based on a tiny market cap lol!