Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Sorry - I am confused.
I read this on the Trial number I sent:
"February 1, 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)"
Which lead me to believe it wasn't reported yet. I'm still confused but that's no problem.
No, so my scientific view is this. The P3 trial requires some results from P2 I would think (I don't know, but there's a reason they didn't run them at the same time). Even though the trial isn't reported, and to my knowledge we don't know the P2 results - the fact that P3 opened (on the same day) tells you that P2 didn't stop the show.,, makes sense to me. I'd read that as a neutral to positive trial result for now.
oilornothing - I might be confused, but there was some conversation about some trial work in the US? - I don't know anything about the company, but I have heard of the drug in a UK context and therefore I checked for UK trials, (the P2 one I linked to as it happens). However, I don't really see why lots of Geographies are important really ( for example, the oxford vaccine trials took place mostly in SA and Brazil did they? - and still approval-able in other jurisdictions) - it might be irrelevant to you - it was scientifically interesting to me (not from a financial point of view, I'm not in this one; I have no view on buy/hold/sell).
Trials rarely open with all sites onboard at the start. At least in the stuff I do. Almost certainly possible more will join in. Also the larger stats might require larger density positive populations than P2 did.
@oilornothing - their beliefs are not my problem thankfully. I'm here only out of curiosity and thought i'd inject a fact or two while passing. See my other one about the uk trial?
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT04385095Do you guys know that the data collection phase should be complete on this by feb 1st, and data therefore due in May - I doubt given the circumstances that it wouldn't report early if there was good quality data.Dates from here.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04385095https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04385095
I don't have time to do the reading around the US stuff just now, but I think we (you, as I am not in) only need one good trial at each phase really....?
Genedrive x Beckman solution is so efficient that “The whole country is looking for automation” Wonder what happens when the rest of the world wants automation as well?? #GDR https://t.co/utUGGpDUhM— Laura ?????? (@littlemissaim) February 10, 2021
I think in covid testing, what really needs to happen is a test that pretty much guarantees it's negative result (there becomes limited point testing people with 50% accurate tests when the objective of the testing is to maintain negative populations as opposed to find and limit positive ones.) Id like to know more but those 100% figures look good! [I'm a scientist]
Hi all, I've been reading for a few days and just wanted to acknowledge my appreciation of your comment, commentary and insight. I'm an ordinary busy person here because bank interest rates are not going to serve my interest in growing what I can save from my hospital sallary. I'm in today at 144.4 on the way up... and 144.6 on the way down. Hoping this kit makes us healthier eh!