RE: Is Flegg Looney, Not IMO11 Jan 2022 13:41
Personally think they wouldn’t of even had their PR company tweet if it wasn’t for the unofficial twitter showing them up!!
This for me all comes down to what’s been mentioned before by yourself (Newkotb) Dickupham & so on, they have zero skin in the game when it comes to share ownership & their own money, they feel no pain, have no desire or need to promote, & worst still I’ve mentioned it in the past to the MF & pretty much falls on deaf ears.. I remember being told it’s not Serica’s style to take that approach, well personally I think times have changed & they should take that approach!!! Serica should of RNS’d the first day back of the New Year the move to 100% cash retention, Mitch Flegg should of been on ProActive Investors interviews & the like shouting about it & thanking BP for the partnership, & now he should be championing the next move & plans going forward.. tell us what the targets are .. a move to the Main Market & get off AIM? Acquisition/merger.. been told this for the last few years.. I’m not knocking them in any other part of the business, as Sasa says there’s no other better company out there at present to match or better them for a safe place to put your money, but I’d certainly be keen for an Andrew Austin to come along & shake it up a little (or a lot)!!
Yesterday’s drop by the bot has happened to many times of recent & nothing to justify it, we should be moving up a gear, Nat Gas is where to be for the next number of years & Serica should be doing it’s upmost to benefit from this & be the No.1 company, so come on Mitch !! I know you read these boards..