Very quickly please!! Lets hope My Potts is way off the mark , I want to be here when we hit at least 13mtpa . Personally I'd be voting against and hope It failed if someone does try
RE: Pro Active Investor Sirius could get by with $400m2 Dec 2019 15:06
Quite! And I have to say in the last call even the way Chris said “hello Yuen “ seemed like he wasn’t expecting much in the way of a question ? Probably being unfair as surely he wouldn’t be in that position in the first place surely ! Anyway I have a feeling we’ll know soon enough hopefully
RE: Pro Active Investor Sirius could get by with $400m2 Dec 2019 14:53
Now that would be encouraging but in all the webcasts I’ve listened to it does always seem that both CF and our finance director ( is Tom still here?) treat Yuen Low with contempt ? So I can’t imagine it’s from “the horses mouth” and surely if we borrow less now it would mean the next load of funding will come sooner so yet more “stress” ????
I wonder if anyone could help me please I've got a few spare pennies to invest elsewhere . I've been considering buying into fracking but every single person I've mentioned it to has suggested I would have to be a complete and utter idiot to do so . Actually quite a few have said I should be taken into care for even thinking about it !
Myo thank you so much for the Flyover tip off and links.
Given the start to the day with the "wobbly"SP and the suggestion from some that it was down to a leaky ship and bad news ahead???? I think it would have been in very bad taste to post them don't you think ? In fact after putting them up on the map then bad news comes out, I might just have had to join KOH outside HQ with a placard or two lol Regards ffc
Thanks wwguk, given you are not the only one to suggest that warrants will be so costly I may have the reluctantly accept I could be a little optimistic ! we shall see . Regards ffc Still more hopeful than some though ,lol
Well we'll find out in the not to distant future won't we ! "I will humour you ffc" But you didn't Aubery did you ! You should go into politic mate they never answer the question asked either .
$600 million ? come on Aubery it seems you don't think any of the $600 million will be debt but not prepared to say ? For the record I believe it will come as part debt and part strategic investor ! Not a big call given that is what the co are suggesting ? And for the record I'm hoping for circa $400 million debt and ÂŁ200 million Strategic And ending Up with circa 10 billion shares in circulation not GKs 13 billion How's that for one of your dreaded Think rampers wild guesses ? Come on Aubery don't hide behind your doom monger approach and have a stab
as of one of last years presentations 13mtpa was going to be 2026 and up until this setback due to funding it was going to be 2025 ! yes you are correct its later now that everything is on hold > IMO this will cost less because we will sell some bond and the expensive part may well be expensive as you suggest . Your questions answered now do you think any of this funding might come via debt?
Aubery On several occasions you keep saying you feel PIs have no appetite for another equity raise ? But that's not one of the options being discussed is it ! and on many many occasions you keep saying that the strategic route will be very costly ? So why if the co have made it very clear they are talking to financial Investors for Debt ( probably bond imo) is that never seen as a positive by you? as clearly it would reduce this "BIG" cost to us via the strategic investors you keep banging on about
Aubery Do you see all of the $600 million coming from a strategic partner ? You seem to dismiss a possibility that we could get a large part of it through bonds or have I misunderstood all your previous suggestions that there little hope for for us ?