A possible positive from the 3rd option maybe is that surely they wouldn't want to try to be trying to hold the sp for to long??? hence new bonds are pending ??
So Cranleigh if it were the 3rd option that would mean the bond holder is prepared to lose possible gains by not holding so probably new bonds at a better rate ??? probably above my pay grade all this !! lol DR thanks for the link re VSM
Talking of SL and dual personalities ... Fred I seem to remember you saying you were convinced SL was not LL as LL was definitely a woman ????? just a thought but could it be that LL is the one with dual persona ???? couple of bottles of Krug then zoom off into the night on her Vespa ??? No reply needed, just saying
Fair enough Oldhamboy... like I said I can see you'r a holder and I understand your worries I'm just fed up with thee constant fighting... I can tell you I do not agree with all posts here butt feel no need to get involved so hate the personal rubbish here.... I also can'r understand a 9 poster slagging off someone that has my respect so don't understand you agreeing so quickly
Oldhamboy I wasn't doubting you are a shareholder but you seem to have made as many personal posts as you have about sxx positive or otherwise .... I understand other holders concerns butt I also understand those that refuse to be other than positive.. I have no axe to grind so cant understand you having a problem with JR say ? and if you look at his posts you will see that he is very happy to hold his hand up when needed.... A fine quality in IMO.. regards ffc
Right now all things considered having looked at ALL the said parties in yet another little spat ? I would suggest both Alan and JR have regularly contributed here and as things stand some others just like to stir things up ??? the two detractors this time don't have so many posts that you cant all check out for yourselves. Sorry dunc and oldamboy but your both saying no content but WTF is yours ...Yes I get argumentative at times but I mix it with a few on topic subjects too. Regards ffc
Thanks DGR that's a good point fair enough ... thats me for the day so hope to tune in tomorrow for a nice RNS ? lol
Cranleigh I don't want to bang on about your 15.05 but that is a cracking bit of detective work and it's cheered me up a bit to think that might be a valid reason ..ffc
Thanks Cranleigh . like everyone here I have my eye on the Build and ST2 but I'm concerned that Tom does not yet appear to have enticed any "Big Boy's" in yet ... I know in a few years when we are getting nearer production then divs we will attract a few but all the same I would have thought there would be a few nibbles at this price ???