Member Info for Feeks

The facts already changed 6-12 months ago, and you chose to ignore what was developing based on past disappointments. I am very glad that I didn't! My biggest holding is here and I am extremely pleased with progress, which display aside, has been very very encouraging in my humblest of opinions, and if display does kick in, which I think will happen when the on-chip QD solutions are commercialised, this will be in a big way.

It was not irrelevant to the many fervent rampers who inhabit this board. Just an example from the past. Not so different as it has been the same story ever since Africa came on the radar. What is it, 5 years now and continued loss making? Good luck!!

Hello Strider, clearly you are a man of reason! Someone can do the maths for me please but yes, I did call this out years ago long long before any else realised Sturec was a turkey and since when the share price has fallen to less than 1% of what it once was. That in my book is a very bad investment. Something like a year ago this was also trading at 5 or 6p and being pumped to the hills so I pointed out the same truths. Anyone falling for the hype had to suffer large losses on paper or in reality. Sturec was also still being banded about as an imminent disposal prospect which was again pure nonsense - it is valueless. This share has been pumped many times but anyone who did not buy very recently got it very badly wrong. I could buy now and beat pretty well everyone who bought sooner. Proves a point doesnt it? And you are right about the funding / dilution. There will be more of that to come for sure.

BTB - your last 2 posts sounds awfully like ramping. I don't really have a problem with exhuberism, but then again I never ever heard a comment like that come from NigWit, the guy you like to criticise for his excessive optimis. So, what's the difference?

Yes markdots that is the only question now. Something could happen but then again it would be a brave man to value any non-business at more than the value of its cash reserves! Ive never quite understood the concept of a shell really... maybe someone can explain. If the plan is to reverse in why do you need the shell and not just buy a new company name at Companies House instead?

The only plausible explanation I can see is that there was some kind of cooperation or agreement to carry out an early trial and the parties fell out due to the way that arrangement was described publicly. If it was another unknown party then it matters little now as there were no contracts.

Dave1982 you must be joking on this one!! No the identity was not named in the RNS (for who's benefit.....?) but then it was named in an interview and the housing provider effectively demonstrated there as no substance to the overblown RNS. And the company was silent because what else could it say. Remarkable!

If it was another social housing association involved then the company just had to say so!

The writing was on the wall at least a year ago. The RNS about the social housing customer was an embarrasing joke - to have your supposed partner publicly denounce things like that

Agreed - see my comment below. From my perspective i dont mind hearing positive and negative opinions as long as the basis for the judgment is made clear. So far BTB has tended to discount the potential upside (basesd on past performance) whereas NW has tended to value the upside more by discounting the reasons for poor past performance. Neither of them is wrong and I applaud NWs efforts at drawing together the threads which make up the future potential here. If revenue targets start to be hit then we can be rightly optimistic

Ok thank you. So we can leave it there and move on. It would be nice to build a new consensus here. My belief is that even after the set back of displays there are clearly big plans afoot and we can look towards a bright future. Displays were only ever going to pave the way into new markets but disappointingly it has largely failed to kick things off for Nanoco. Bit even that market could still take off with a bang at some point - though maybe not before the emergence of microLEDs

Just out of interest Masterbaker what are you holding?

£30m

£39m fund raise that is

BTB aren't you waiting to load up at 18p after the fundraise..? Or are you prepared to accept that this is not a credible "worst case scenario"?

Today's news was good news by the way folks. Further validation of the tech and increased revenues to underpin revenue projections for 2019 and 2020. There is nothing to dislike

Ah yes, Crow's flawed comprehension, yes that is probably it. We can always give him the words, but not the comprehension. It reminds me of my father's saying - "I could send a lettuce on an all-expenses-paid round the world trip but it still wouldn't come back a Professor of Geography!"

That's a particularly negative interpretation of the facts, which is simply wrong, and of no consequence now anyway. Barely worth saying

So does charity. You might want to reflect on thr needless bashing of one correct poster

Yes I am glad you keep showing them up. I agree with you 100% but mostly I don't have the time to post. I really believe that 2 or 3 years from now though Nanoco will have proven to be a roaring success. It is coming.