Member Info for Feeks

It is indeed a decent buy and undoubtedly a sign of confidence in the company direction. People often criticise the lack of Direct purchases, and when one is made the size of that purchase. This is usually without any real understanding of the personal circumstances / financial constraints of that individual.

Hi Nigwit. Did your research miss out Quantum Materials? They announced a 16nm FWHM in Nov 2018 for cadmium free green dots making up 91% of Rec2020. The share price has also nearly tripled in rapid time, from less than 2c in Mid March to 5.35c at yesterday's close due to their cimmercial deal in India. As you know, as previously stated I am also invested in QMC. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/11/07/1646844/0/en/Quantum-Materials-Corp-Achieves-Industry-Leading-91-Rec2020-Color-Gamut-Performance-with-Remote-Phosphor-On-chip-Quantum-Dot-Technology.html

Spot on Hawi! I am not buying it either. What an empty criticism it is to criticise a company looking to commercialise its tech for the first time that it is now in bed with a very large company which will dominate its near term sales profile. I believe the bigger picture is becoming increasingly assured. For one thing we know revenues are guaranteed on service contracts alone for the whole of 2019. Thats great news and 50p is very strongly underpinned now. I bought more stock yesterday. I also agree that ME's tone has changed dramatically. He was far.less hesistant in giving answers than he has been before and still expects to receive film orders for display. I do not agree with the flip.floppers who are now predicting doom.again. Very obviously they are looking for a short term buy in price and they got it yesterday.

Sounding good to me :-)

I am not judging it by personal preference. I said "people like me". The product developers will be well aware of the resistance to mass adoption they will face asking people to balance a new piece of tech off their nose when they could just hold it or put it away in a pocket like you do with the current tech. If i dont want to be bothered i just move my phone out of eyeline on silent. AR has suffered with the drawback of the user experience of having to wear something on the head so its the same issue. That's why the glasses are being promoted more as a niche product for use by police officers, fire crew museum goers, etc..where the benefits are more compelling. The last time I checked we are not all cyborgs!

That'll be an April Fool then

No i don't much like wearing sunglasses. I wear them when I must. I have no problem with contact lenses but i dont see any near term revenue stream beckoning for an AR contact lens product. I am saying that the case for smart phones being irksome or inconvenient is massively overstated. I have never thought of them as that and doubt that many people do.

It's hard to believe that people like me who don't like wearing glasses will ever choose to wear them when its not needed. There is far les inconvenience carrying a phone in one's pocket. IMO

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/phys.org/news/2019-01-scientists-visible-infrared.amp Interesting. How does this differ from what Firefly carewear does I wonder?

Nigwit did you invest in Wah Hong?

I only have my ecperience of the school science lab as a benchmark comparison. Is it a lot then?

BBD you say the US deal is financially rewarding like never before but do we actually know this will not be another idle factory like the DOW plant? No we don't and nor does the market. Until then 40-50p range is where we seem to be stuck.

Frankly then it ought to be good enough to benefit that chosen charity of mine....?

I think Elon Musk is a different kettle of fish tbf

You have always been profoundly negative from what I can recall. I am not going to spend my valuable time searching back, what are you trying to say?

Wow! Are you seriously now suggesting that you always held Nanoco shares!?!?!? The biggest doomsayer of them all held shares all this time? Frankly dumbfounded!

Trump's approach to Iran doesn't help us yet but longer term it may do. Credit due to Trump this time, his foreign policy bearing fruit despite his personal shotcomings. This probably means WSG has no way of pulling off its Iran deal until Trump finally backs off as victor. But if this success leads to Iran political upheaval and nothing but a hard line Govt as replaceme then that will be that..... . The way this has gone I dont think WSG can now justify its former statemnt that its deal is unaffected by the sanctions as clearly everything is affected. Is there any other possibility on the cards? --------------------- .https://m.theepochtimes.com/why-trumps-iran-sanctions-are-working_2818283.html Fear of triggering U.S. retaliation is so pervasive that many European banks have  refusedIranian financial transactions even for imports of goods exempt from the sanctions, and branch offices of Iranian-owned companies in Europe have had  trouble finding local phone and internet service providers.

So many red flags....

Bloodshot you have to understand that Ortac was in a desperate fix when Sturec went wrong and the African speculation was just a rag bag of hopeful punts which was intended to breath new life into the co. which it did, for people soon forgot the previous disasters and started valuing those prospects on the assumption that 4 punts is collectively worth very much more than the sum of its parts as if the risk no longer counted - a bit like having 4 goes at the fair ground coconut shy only to find that the bottom cans were nailed to the shelf. All I see now.is Zamsort taking on the sort of status Sturec once did. The only safe way to play this is extreme scepticism

A bad day. 6 months earlier the announcement was that it was contracated for sale but then failed to mention this deal had terminated. Stuff like that does matter.