Member Info for Feeks

Still no positive reason to invest here but if anyone was in doubt before the writing is well and truly on the wall now. Awful mismanagement for years IMO, at the cost of LTH. There was a proper opportunity to be grabbed by the horns with the S litigation but they spilled the chance.

TW-

More AI slop. So dull...

What about posting an original thought?

You have given AI a leading prompt towards the bull case, which is fine if you are prepared to accept that it what it is. But that's all it is - and so be in no doubt it takes a large investment gamble and leap of faith to believe that any investor right now will pay the IP "worth" at premium above current SP. What precisely is the incentive for any bidder to strike early given the onward R&D phase and company will sooner or later be running short of cash?

TW - where immediate prospects are so vague and indeterminate the only rational investment pricing is to calculate the value of a diminishing cash pile, because if the cash runs out this business will end up as a fire sale. I've consistently said this for the past, what now, 2 years? The SP is where it should be. For completeness, It would be of assistance to readers here if you would publish the AI prompt you used to accompany the rest of your text.

But on that test at least there would need to be prompt publication (without delay) - so why the delay? I pity anyone still invested here. I keep an eye on WSG like I do with all my old flames but almost without exception they have continued to disappoint for many years after I have exited. I would encourage all investors to take a risk off approach on AIM, as ordinary punters get badly hurt far too often.

Sold mine, so just watching for news of RR/ profitabilty which is how I tend to inveat these days (risk off!). Good luck but I think it will take more time to deliver based on current political circumstances.

My thoughts: the business has not yet shown that it can reach profitability

Fixed that for you.

Come again?

Happy days :-)

It’s seems the main bone of contention was factored around the original £46m valuation which was based on forecasts with inherent risk, and have now placed company valuation at a much lower enterprise value of £12.1m, although I’d expect that to rise a bit with the LG settlement.

That's big stuff. I wouldn't touch this with a bargepole. They have not managed to sell and evidently they cannot seem to do that at the lofty price hoped for.

Totally agree 100% ! Why the banner "Oh dear lads"!?!? This is great for AIM.

$5m sounds ok, it's about what I would have expected. It was never high value litigation post-Samsung.

On another note I am not sure I can cope with reading any more output from Terry AI.

Take out licensing fees and grants and what have you got

....?

100% agree. Share buy backs are generally bad news. It's a bad sign if the Directors cannot find better ways to keep growing the business

I won't be re- investing on a hail mary hope. Was litigation ever the cherry on the cake? I have my doubts but no doubt Tenner thought he could sell the deal and ride it out much like Eden directors have overseen a perma- loss making company for more than two decades!

Https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c4gp6pmenl0o

What sort of foam do we suppose Nike are using?

Why do you equate "in line" with " below " market expectations?

Https://tandlonline.com/haulage-fleet/haulage/transense-launch-translogik-tlgi-digital-handheld-tyre-inflator/

Market reacting to perceived uncertainty, and a few caught by the grift, but probably a good value entry point for a business which is making the right moves.