RE: Deleted10 Apr 2019 12:30
Amtech that is a very simplistic approach. So you believe if a user posts and is then questioned on the detail which is not forthcoming, it is acceptable to allow misleading information.
I repeat your recent experience where a user was unable to qualify spurious calculations which even you could not understand.
a1m1 has made personell remarks about me this morning, these are quite false and yet as you would believe such posts are deleted. Not so why?
You talk about name calling, right just explore the names being called in June last year. Those posts remain.
If LSE don't apply the rules evenly users will desert.
It is interesting there are many boards here where there is greater banter and name calling without action. Guess the users on those boards don't have the same clout!!