RE: unless2 Oct 2018 22:55
Maybe.
For anyone joining today a brief summary and my interpretation too.
1. Hudson own more than 50% of the shares
2. Hudson vetoed the agm motion to have shares issued. Basically that would dilute them under 50%.
3. Bzm owe Hudson, China sonongol $20 million.
4. Hudson have a loan agreement with bzm and $3.2 million of this is undrawn.
5. Hudson have not backed bzm with more money - so loan drawdown seems unlikely and unless Hudson want diluting to a minority stake then bzm run out of cash.
6. If bzm run out of cash then Hudson lose out on the $20 million that bzm owe.
7. Hudson would appear to have first claim on the assets but today the rns said “nternational and, in any case, the Company's main assets have meaningful monetary value only if Bellzone continues as a going concern.”
8. So if bzm fo bust it would appear the asset value is less than if bzm stay listed
9. The mining convention has strict timelines to allow mining of kalia. If the ferro nickel project stalls then it could mean losing the license. Same with kalia.
Dyor