Member Info for EricDraven

Thanks for your replies. I’ll take it there’s nothing new then, but that the time to this pesky SAC decision is very short now.

Good luck to all invested eh?

Have a decent weekend.

Pmsl. I just get a “Bad Gateway” message so am unable to view it.

SJ. Now that’s not funny.

Hi Sooz. Shouldn’t be too long. Surely the Supreme Administrative Court has had plenty of time to ruminate and acquire at least one biro.

Agreed Wots. Where’s a handy atom bomb when you need one?

Blast! Lol.

SJ, the PFS should be something we can look forward to, by the sound of it.

Dunno though with BEM do we?! Lol.

Suzy, 99.99%.

🙂

Decent news. Well done to Rasmus and his team in Finland.

Better than crimson red. Lol

Wots, great, any uppy is good uppy.

Good that Troajie.

I’m not certain what progress is really being made in Finland, how quickly Rasmus is building the business, only that he does appear to be busy. I wouldn’t mind another update on the state of play at the project there. What are we waiting on etc.

SJ, I agree, and it’s disappointing that Ed so readily took the quickest fix of raising money below our nominal value rate. I mean, considering the pre-production value of our assets and the quality of KN alone. The shares and Options were thrown about like confetti.

…..know….

Sooz, Ed raising below our nominal value, well, we shall never knkw how much effort was put into avoiding that scenario, but it’s a bitter pill for me, due to the subsequent granting of Options at what subsequently is now at such a low ‘achievement’ price. I’m concerned as to whose priorities he put first. It doesn’t seem like it was ours.

Not sure why Eddie decided on a 50:1 ratio for the consolidation either. It would have been so much easier for shareholders surely for him to do a 100:1 ratio. Maybe the hope is that existing shareholders find it more difficult to work out how knackered our holdings are, lol, depending on what occurs with the sp following the change.

Hi Oily. Sorry to hear about the loss of your pal, it’s sad when we lose good people. I miss Treetop’s posts, he passed away as well.

As far as I’m aware, the reindeer are already in Laponia. Both forest and mountain deer. We’d fence our operation off and the deer would navigate out of the Heritage Site on to their migration routes. There would be no damage or threat to the deer from our operation.

Wod, we weren’t talking about migration routes though, more about the inbuilt buffer zone within the recognised boundary extent of the Laponian Heritage Site, by way of insulating it from activity outside of the zone.

Oily, hello. Wodman is referring to me, Eric, and I’ve been invested here since 2010.

Hope that clarifies.

Best wishes.

Wod, hi. Are you saying that the reindeer cannot be navigated around a fenced project with a tiny radius? In the grand scheme of things.

Dunno.