RE: US Rig Count...10 Jun 2019 17:19
Tom - The DUCs and Capex, and their tie-in to production also need to be taken in the context of higher oil prices last year and a decent amount of hedging that was last year by US producers for 2019. That has all but disappeared now with WTI in the low 50s, but producers were making capex decisions based on what they could get for 2019 on their hedged prices, I'd suggest.
Beerbull pointed to cashflow at any cost being the driver for production - that I don't believe is the case at this point in time. As you've pointed out, Wall Street is now asking E&Ps to show them the money and that they can actually live within their means. Q1 2019 has still seen overall negative cashflows from operations and that means debt can't be paid down. We're in no good shape now in Q2 compared to Q1, and that tells us that there'll be bankruptcies in the shale patch and production growth should stagnate. However, the US is now producing huge amount of oil/condensates and this is the main reason why the EIA inventories aren't coming down and are still increasing.
Capex is still needed to bring these DUCs to production and we know that cash flow break evens vary depending on where these wells are located, even with the Permian ( for example - Delaware being lower than Midland as a simple rule of thumb), and to your point, at current prices, it doesn't make too much economic sense to bring them to production and they may stay plugged for the foreseeable future.