RE: Correction8 Jan 2019 11:55
No, they haven't revised the price target, which is loads of boll***s anyway, since Vic M still refers to Scolty and Kraken's issues as being the 'driver'..Lol.
I can't imagine why Scolty has ever been a contributing factor to recent valuation for ENQ. They have always stated that any improvements there would be after the remedial works in Q3 2019. Kraken I do understand is underperforming a bit, but her comments for retaining the 15p target is reflective of unwillingness to pull back from the deep hole she dug for herself with that half-baked 'research'.
Her projected EBITDA numbers for 2018 are maybe on the lowside, given that the price hedge levels for the H2 of 2018 are higher than H1 2018. I'd say that we'll end up with an EBIDTA closer to $700 mill for 2018 and we'll be well inside the covenant ratio for H1 2019. This $700 mill EBITDA is for the 'core' business excluding the 75% magnus contribution, which we should get for one month (December 2019), since the Magnus deal closed on the 1st December.
@Fernan - if I may point out in your spreadsheet (Line 45 of Core Business tab) that the RCF debt for 2019 is overcooked. It was already down to $785 million as of end of November, with the $200 mill paydown in October and the $65 mill payment in November.
Best