Business ethics has nothing to do with the law and legal rules. If you mean that China and Russia have better trading laws than the West then I don't think so.
Unfortunately they would be well prepared to defend themselves and they are not going to reply with anything to excuse themselves of any responsibility. It's up to us to LEGALLY prove with hard evidence there was a criminal reason for it.
Pulling a plug off a JV happens all the time in world markets. It's not a crime in itself. But doing it deliberately and with a plan to fraud, that is a crime IF YOU CAN PROVE IT in court
Yes, but leaving aside morality and ethics, what is the hard evidence to prove they acted ILLEGALLY?... If there is hard evidence there was illegality, fine. And I am not asking to reveal it in a public forum as it might jeopardize investors' case... Let's keep calm and focus on the legal aspect and its PROVEN EVIDENCE THAT LAWS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED OR BROKEN, which is what it counts in a court of law.... We all know all sorts of court cases where the guilty party walked off scot free only because of the missing little tiny detail could not be proven
I repeat I do believe your claims... But I am not a court of law,,,, I hope a trial will find them true... If not, it won't be the first time the wrong side wins.
Well, I do believe in your claims. Unfortunately I am not a law court, if you can prove all that in a court of law will be fantastic. the court of law decision is what counts
Good news is no guarantee of anything. Buying and selling is at your own risk.... Unless you can prove in court that the 'good' news were purposefully fabricated to fraud you of your money
Was the information given to you free of any caveats?... Did the COPL board directly say to you to buy, sell, etc shares?... While you may have a millions or reasons to blame the company you got to expect millions of reasons from them to claim the opposite
yes, all stakeholders includes shareholders. Unless wrongdoing from executives is proved against them and legally required to resign, they have got to keep running the company --- as usual....
Trading suspension it not a good sign BUT it does not mean the company is in administration. So it is the board duty to continue to run it in the best interest of all stakeholders and this includes producing. If and when it goes into administration all powers will be invested into an administrator and will then take all decision