Member Info for Ella10

1plus1,
Good question. In his last interview he mentioned the cost of one of these 1000m diamond drill holes - it was a bit scary. Does the diamond drilling make the job of trying to understand the geology easier?

https://www.wildfooduk.com/mushroom-guide/dryads-saddle/

Thanks CB - Very reassuring. :-)

After reading your posts this evening I listened to the presentation again - I think we have a reasonable chance of hitting a couple of areas of gold before the year is out. It's an exploration company so nothing is guaranteed but I am assuming CB has got my message about improving comms. I did contemplate buying a few Bezant shares but I'll leave it for the moment...

The cross section from the RNS shows the porphyry intrusions
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/7985Z_3-2021-5-25.pdf
I assume the geos deduce the location of the intrusiond from the rock type in the drill core. How do they deduce how far above the drill core they continue?

With my ever realistic approach I don't think the SP will drop much lower. I'm assuming we'll get a Manica update in the next few weeks and, assuming it is still showing progress, and a realistic expectation of reasonable production within the next six to nine months then we should be on the way up again. If it has slipped passed H2, which I assume it has, then CB needs to provide some compelling info to convince us of progress.

HD,
I think we'll probably have drilled over 800m, a progress update could land any day but is very likely within the next week. I'm really looking forward to all the comms in the coming weeks and months - I will be watching closely.

We haven't heard any words of wisdom from Andrew4444 - I hope this bb was just a bit mad for him today and his words of wisdom return.

HD,
Yes an interesting presentation. I am looking forward to our next RNS - I am sure it will be divine. :-)

I haven't been following this closely the last couple of weeks but is that tweet suggesting they may have to manufacture the innova test?

With all that money in the bank and the funds due from SZ are we going to get some large dividends? :-)

Steve,
Sorry to disappoint neither ex special forces nor a rottweiler.
CB has just been very fortunate in having gained my attention. :-)

Great presentation with realistic views of progress and potential. I really enjoyed the little nuggets of info from the geologists that improved my ability to interpret results and gave me more confidence in the potential.
HOWEVER, CB needs to ensure any RNS reflects reality and is issued in a timely manner. CB does do good interviews and I'm sure folk will still want to hear from him, enthusiasm for the project is good but please differentiate between potential and known.

PLEASE improve the comms and deliver ALL news in a timely manner - the company will ultimately benefit.

Got to admit this did impress me - realistic view of progress and potential with no BS. Only at the start of the journey but got some great potential.

Hi Steve,
Have a look at the cross section. It looks like holes 2 and 3 were on target?
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/7985Z_3-2021-5-25.pdf

LittleWing,
It's worth having a look at all the drill results we have so far in context of the IP survey. As far as I can see the IP survey suggests higher mineralisation than shown in previous drills. I looked at BRD009 and tried to compare it to the IP survey. Obviously its impossible to be very accurate.

I don't think the today's RNS mentions the 2MT. I think for the moment this has been put to one side. I expect a mineable resource but not of the scale previously hoped for. Obviously there is always a hope that we hit some new significant areas of mineralisation that bring the 2MT back into play.

Sorry 0.2% sections

Graham,
The latest RNS doesn't give any indication of cutoff for the 2% sections.

It is interesting to look at the remaining holes and how they were reported in the previous RNS versus mineralistion now shown on diagrams.
Eg hole 5
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/7985Z_2-2021-5-25.pdf

I would expect this RNS to have been well vetted.