Member Info for Ella10

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assessment-and-procurement-of-coronavirus-covid-19-tests/outcome-of-the-evaluation-of-rapid-diagnostic-assays-for-specific-sars-cov-2-antigens-lateral-flow-devices

I suspect those 2 large trades was someone transferring the shares into their pension.

TM I may be missing something but my understanding is PD use a dilution of 10 power 2 for their sensitivity test. It looks from the data from. Wellcome and FIND data suggest that mologic test would struggle with this dilution. I am not sure how PD defined the dilutions or how critical they are in real life.

The most common reason for kit failure with Innova was transfer of liquid within the device.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(21)00204-2/fulltext

The evaluation by FIND and Wellcome do suggest that the mologic test will struggle at 10 power 2 dilution.

Trickymatters I'm guessing they really have messed up if they are using freeze dried BLOOD samples.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assessment-and-procurement-of-coronavirus-covid-19-tests/protocol-for-evaluation-of-rapid-diagnostic-assays-for-specific-sars-cov-2-antigens-lateral-flow-devices

Anyone know if this existed or what it stated before 3rd June?

Are there any photos of the mologic lfts? If they are 1/4 of the price and detection wise at least as good is the cassette just too flimsy? I'm not saying it is I'm just trying to understand why these might be failing.

FIND states the lowest dilution level detected is 2.5 x 10 power 2 but PD uses 10 power 2 for their lowest level dilution (pfu/ml).
The article says it's failing due to kit failure but its difficult to know what that encompasses from the article.
The PD summary procedure says updated the 3rd June - was this the first release?

Both the Wellcome and FIND trials suggest that the highest dilution level used by Porton Down would fail. I'm not saying this is where the test is failing but it looks like a potential mechanism for Porton Down to fail where the others didn't.

The summary process Porton Down use was updated on the 3rd June. Does anyone know what the updates were ? I don't think we know at what stage the test is failing.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assessment-and-procurement-of-coronavirus-covid-19-tests/protocol-for-evaluation-of-rapid-diagnostic-assays-for-specific-sars-cov-2-antigens-lateral-flow-devices

I suspect you're correct Gixxer - interesting. There will still be at least 25% of the 100m shares paid for Prospectore floating around - I assume some are Jeremy Reads.

The Kabwe licence is due for renewal in Oct. There appear to be some changes towards the North of the Kabwe licence - I assume this is JLP going to a small scale mining licence. There doesn't appear to be an application in for the Ka****u part of the licence yet but perhaps it is awaiting for the other transfer to go through first.

We also have AEM survey results to come as mentioned in THE interview. Looking through the RNS I couldn't see it mentioned but presumably results will be available before we are too far into phase 2 drilling.

The latest long section diagram appears to show that drill 2 and 3 went either side of drill 1 somewhere around 550 R.L. metres. I am assuming the mineralisation for drill 1 is correct, in that there is reasonable mineralisation along most of the length. Trying to visualise where drill 1 would come through on the cross section diagram I have convinced myself that holes 2 and 3 and the cross section diagram may present a less optimistic view than could exist as a wider picture. I may well be deluding myself. I wonder if we will get a more detailed model with the next assay results - I assume drill 1 tells more of the story than we currently know.

Hi JDau,
You might want to read my post again..

Hi DeSteen,
The number of subsidiaries and where they are registered - obviously I realised some of them existed but not all. I thought some folk who may not have been aware might find it interesting considering the prior discussion on company accounts.

I've previously had a dig around Companies House for XTR and was surprised at some of the sturcture. I have just come across the following group structure on XTRs website which I must say really surprised me considering I thought I was reasonably well researched.
https://xtractresources.com/group-structure/

Hi Sq52,
The following diagram from the last assay RNS shows mineralisation on the last 2 holes. This RNS will have been well scrutinised so I expect the mineralised section to be as shown here. Obviously we don't know the grades yet.
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/7985Z_2-2021-5-25.pdf

I am looking forward to the update on Manica. I expect it to have convincing content even if the timescales aren't to our liking. Unfortunately that article from today may have scared the update into next month.

Annual report (inc Manica update).
Assays for last 2 drills but the latest long section showing mineralisation for these 2 holes suggest there won't be any surprises.
AEM survey results - I think these will be another couple of weeks.

Chri5p,
My post below is a copy from the 17th May (hence the quotes) also further down in this thread where I make it clear that I knew the SFR purchase of GLR shares was unconditional but the licence sale was conditional. I'm not claiming I don't make mistakes but this wasn't one :-) .