Member Info for EIE01

Wolfe - Your comment about posters having kids.

Really?

You are up there with the best that continually writes constant nonsense and act like a school kid.

Seriously who is interested in idiotic posts about curry’s etc

If your looking for mates to meet I’d suggest there are far more suitable sites out there.

Is your son aware of the nonsense you post, think he would think highly of it.

Wolfe - What will come first………Eua sale or Everton relegation?

Personally can’t wait for both events, put an end to the endless wineing and moaning.

TC - Pretty much made a third of today’s posts.

What has he actually said, what constructive comments made?

Zilch

Wolf - How am I making excuses, there is NO requirement to RNS the sale of concentrate, but you won’t accept that, you prefer to stick to the narrative that the BOD lie.

You always stick with that narrative, BOD lie, BOD not capable etc etc etc

No more to add, as little point in conversing with someone who sole purpose is to continually moan, criticise.

Hindsight is a wonderful thing

Wolfe - What’s with the name calling?

The selling of the concentrate is everyday business, doesn’t require an RNS, as such no one can say as a fact it’s been sold or not.

Does M&S release a RNS to state we sold 4,500 buns a today……of course not, it’s every today business.

Some investors want their hands held at each stage it seems.

Bfl - How do you know concentrate hasn’t been sold.

I certainly believe selling of the concentrate doesn’t require a RNS.

So how do you know it hasn’t been sold?

Yesterday’s decision has no relevance to the sale, it would happen regardless.

Proceeds for the shares in question would simply sit in escrow until ownership confirmed

Of course EUA weren’t simply going to issue a replacement certificate.

There are appropriate procedures in place to issue a replacement.

It appeared to be the case that Queeld didn’t want to follow those procedures and requirements, hence it went this far.

Ultimately real winners are lawyers, but what alternative was there if a party chooses the ignore agreed procedure.

This issue wasn’t go to stop any transaction, that has been stated in RNS, common sense really.

If a sale was to happen next week, I’d imagine the proceeds in respect of these shares will be held in an escrow until Mar 24 and at which point will be distributed to Queeld provided no other party comes forward.

No more complicated than that.

Toffers post both ways looooolllll

Something tells me we are going to start seeing lots of posts 5085

Makeabundle - Why do think CS exercising some options is linked to potentially enticing a higher bid price.

Genuine question.

Your comment did make me think that perhaps there is a bid on the table, but BOD are trying to obtain a higher price.

The fact CS stated at the AGM that he was confident/optimistic (can’t remember exact wording) that a deal will be completed prior to year end, but he was unable to go into details.

Is there an offer on the table that the BOD have said will be accepted prior to year end if no improved offer is received.

Just a thought.

And IT starts with her endless posts saying the same things over and over and over again, non stop.

Apparently holds shares to the value of £2 and yet spends hours on here

Toffers - “………unleash the beast” lol so funny you utter fantasist

Do tell which of the magic circle law firms you worked for?

Sirplacealot - Rampers/holders that are positive whatever you want to call them, haven’t really disappeared, I believe it’s more the case that such holders don’t feel the need to be constantly posting on here all day long, digging out and name calling other posters.

Such comments really serve no purpose, and personally I can’t understand the mentality of posters.

Until I hear differently and I mean OFFICIALLY then I continue to hold and trust the BOD to get a deal over the line.

I really have no idea what the potential price maybe 15p-30p

I do know that any buyer will be getting a very good deal in comparison to pre war, when the price would had been significantly more.

Yes my mistake.

Big of you to start with all the name calling.

Enjoy your £400 from Eua sale

Question for you.

At 12:48 today you posted “Done sold, only had 20k”

Later you post “sold 100k”

So what is it?

Tygra - Maybe others didn’t exercise their options, because this isn’t a slam dunk.

These are very uncertain times, with ever changing requirements and hurdles to deal with.

Maybe the option holders are willing uncertain in regards putting in additional funds.

The options can be taken up whilst in a closed period, but then can’t be sold until out of the close period.

Maybe the company were advised that extending again would not be correct and as such pay up or let them expire.

But surely we can all agree, that if there has been a material change in regards the potential sale of assets, the BOD and advisors have an obligation to inform the market.

They won’t sit on this information, the reputational damage done to advisor would be far to great.

Mac - Seriously……..”Ref the options, possibly didn't take the full amount to minimise shareholder dilution after a longer than expected asset sale process.”