Member Info for Eddie21

Perrina- DITTO- good post

Shaggy- I opened in Firefox with no problems !

Works fine to me. Looks nice I like it

LOL-RUSTY.. It just goes to show that � You can't keep a good man down� ( or filtered for long) ! Enjoy whilst it lasts

Each Ad-tech company will do what it needs to do depending on how desperate they are to retain their clients and how dependable and satisfied those clients are with the service they are receiving. Rubicon will do what they need to do and others will do what they need to do! SIMPLES

Just a few more ... As Blinx once was over valued at �2.40... by the same token I really think it is now undervalued by a significant margin.. lots of lil tactical top ups up to now with an eye for big ones IF we dip further again,

I do agree with you that like many companies out there Blinx was overvalued before the downward trend in SP and the short attack that followed. We know that now! it was swimming against the current, carrying unjustified primum from its past short lived technological advantages. However with respect Oldtimer, you are not comparing apples with apples here! buying an AIM company V buying a FTSE company..? Totally different beasts. AIM is and always has been high risk high reward marketplace with different rules (or lack of it). If you draw "Opportunity Cost" comparisons with other AIM companies, particularly within the AD-Tec industry then your argument will carry more weight and relevance. IMO

Yes Bouncy..been busy here adding too... around 270p !!! It will be rude not to. !! LOL... all to win back for those with log term strategy now !! good luck all

Oldtimer.. Can we not tempt you to buy NOW.. around Upper �20s.. / �3.0 So you are definitely going to wait for �2.0 before you buy any?

A good example of relevant and necessary steps to future proof our service and align it with what the advertisers are going to be expecting for their money.

Well spotted BMAC- Thank you

Agree, we need more clarity in November to minimise uncertainty. But the other key point you mention is the �Long term� outlook. I feel we have kind of arrived at a major crossroads, R1 are following what they said with action and are consolidating and expanding in to something bigger that they believe is going to be big enough and technologically adaptable enough to survive the ad-tech reformation period ahead. Hence a lot of existing PIs maybe finding this process too unsettling and risky and therefore are bailing out regardless. IIs on the other hand are still buying!! Seems to me they are buying in an orderly manner as to not increase the SP too quickly until such time that they have hoovered up ALL the abandoned shares from PI s ?? Naturally they, (IIs ) are betting on a successful outcome say 12 months down the road when all the integration is finalised and bottom line profits start to trickle through. Given where R1 is today I don�t personally think this is the kind of share that you are going to dip IN & OUT of very often now and make money. I don�t believe there are that many regular traders left chasing this share either given the nature of the SP movements over the last year or so. There seems to be a crystallization of opinion happening between those who believe in R1 future and those who don�t. Either way not a share for the faint hearted at the moment.

STT- I am quite aware of what you wrote and what I wrote-Thank you I think a lot of fellow posters here are quite capable of reading between the lines of what we all post and they can distinguish between subtle insinuation/scare mongering and genuine statement of facts and thirst for balanced discussion. So I do agree with you totally, let readers here decide for themselves as to where I am coming from and where you are coming from on this

STT- your whole argument regarding lessons from Blackrock etc ..is dated and obsolete , although worth remembering. You are drawing comparisons between two very different investing companies ( Tosca & Blackrock) about their role and possible impact in (R1) during very different times. Problem is R1 is�nt Blinx anymore , it hasn�t been for quite some time. .its a different company at a very different stage of its development and in a very evolving different market. Blinx was over stretched technologically and left behind in mobile and other areas when the infamous blog came along to trigger the short attack. I am a �long term� investor in certain shares that I like and buy shares mostly to keep for 2-5 years if I can. Hence I did pretty well with my strategy and still in a little bit of profit. I am so glad I didn�t reduce and kept buying towards my Holding Target which I am pretty close to now. Your Other Point about RG What wrong with RG buying and selling some stock..( and buying back again) he is still a substantial shareholder isn�t he? Have a nice weekend

STT- You missing the point my friend their investors won�t make any money if Toscas investment in R1 doesn�t pay up. Its very simple. We have had this conversation before, For every bad investment Tosca make they make 10 good investments thats why they have the reputation they have. So for now I will be following their moves as I am sure they know a lot more than me and you put together.

Their agenda is to make money for their investors and hence its unlikely they are going to go in to anything blind

Time will solve all these mysteries regarding all the recent changes in the industry. In the meantime to keep things simple from the investment point of view.. I rather go with Tosca and at least half a dozen other institutions who are lapping up all the available shares. Maybe they know something non of us here know! ? Is that remotely possible?

Agree, the Top and Bottom of this STT is that advertisers are going to be more fussy now regarding where and through whom their adverts appear. No one is disputing that. As I have said before, the advertising budgets will get tighter and further rationalised with more focus, on the other hand, there is also going to be much less competition left out there for R1 We are witnessing this already through the drop outs and M&As that are happening as we speak. We know people need to advertise and companies need to maintain and service their brands. I like others here, think this in the medium term is going to play in to the hands of R1 and companies like R1 who have been investing and been trying to safeguard and introduce at least SOME protection for the advertisers.

No less immune than any other ad-tech company out there. But on much stronger ground than most regarding their well recognised anti-fraud functionality!

Lets face it STT, whichever way around the "ads txt "capability came from, you for one don�t seem to like R1 deploying anything useful or be successful in anything. It is crystal clear that you detest R1 and everything they do with a passion. So please don�t insult people�s intelligence here and try and pretend you care about R1 and their future in any shape and form and that you want them to do well.