Member Info for Ecofriendly

You know JG, it’s not as if anything I’ve said has been inaccurate. I sat on the sidelines for a long time and was appalled at what you and your fellow rampers repeatedly posted.

You keep coming back to the same theme. Negative comments not welcome.

I (and I’m sure I’m not alone ) had family who fought and died for the right to express opinions - it’s the British way- and I won’t be silenced by people like you.

You and and your colleagues should be ashamed of yourselves. You comment on things you have no comprehension of - luckily from the number of posters, few are listening.

Hope is all you have, Pearls

It’s certainly looking that way and the market is likely to reflect that by marking the shares down.

That said, the company are spin masters and will no doubt be attempting to put some polish on the turd in the run up to the results.

My investment decisions JG are based on company fundamentals , a long terms view and a reasoned view on company management capability and prospects. The rise in the sp was not sustainable as has been shown by the fallback and to quote a city analyst these shares are casino chips.

I would love to see this company succeed. I think the ship has sailed however and the blatant misrepresentation from other posters, not you, is simply wrong.

JG, would you ask that question if I said, I was tracking this stock, I’m not invested but it looks really exciting and all the evidence shows it’s going to at least triple in value in the short term and rise by 600% in the mid term? What is your agenda?

Pearls, we have already been through this and you were handed a lesson on how to read the Q1 announcement correctly.

I did have a look at some of your 6500+ posts and it seems you don’t have much luck on your other investments either. Probably time you called it a day, take whatever is left of your failures, give it to a money manager and just leave it to those who know what they are talking about.

Almost 6 months n and still no new contracts announced, no forward guidance and no evidence they will come anywhere close to break even in 2025.

Everything indicates, at this point in time a very difficult year in which their competitors will move further ahead.

It is potentially a criminal offence for a company to not disclose info that could impact the share price.

At one point the company valuation doubled before dropping 30% again. If this was insider buying then the company, already under active investigation by the FCA, would be in big trouble. As it is there is no evidence of that. More likely some saw the selling as overdone and , whilst overcorrecting, is now at the level commensurate with its intrinsic value.

Anyone hoping for the lucrative contracts with new customers that will see a heavily loss making company transform into a beautiful swan in the coming months are likely to be disappointed.

Perhaps someone will buy their order book in the future. but hard to see anyone paying anywhere near it’s current valuation.

RE: 37p offered to sell 37k!19 May 2025 10:21

Let’s blow past 40’s..

63-75.6p looks promising as per the charts

With his Mystic Meg shawl on, Up2date consulted the charts and came out with the above crap😂😂😂😂

This is nonsense. Maybe 17p was oversold but given the ability of the company to continue trading in the medium term is far from assured , 39p may prove to be the high point. That’s the reason I suggested taking profits or cutting massive losses. The rise was based on pure hope value and nothing else.

Up2date, Thanks for explaining how the markets work. Any thoughts on how to solve the Israeli conflict? Even though you’ve made yourself look a complete tit with your silly predictions, I was talking to Keir Starmer and he would love to hear your opinion.

Up2date/Spratt/Mystic Meg

Pearls, fwiw, I think Walkley is correct and you have misread this.

From an investment view, it is a very critical point and I’m sure the company can clarify that for you.

If you do contact the company it would be useful to share its response.

Pearls, perhaps we’re just interpreting things differently but this is not a growth stock- growing faster than its sector peers, generating large sales and reinvesting profits rather than paying dividends to shareholders.

It is loss making and cannot provide any clearer guidance beyond a hope they will land contracts and get to a point of break even some time soon from its current loss making position . Does that sound like a growth stock.

Pearls, you are forecasting £40m in revenue. Where on earth are you getting this? If this was even in the ball park then if the shares rose with a P/E ratio of let’s say 7, this could see a company valuation of £280m-£300m. In another you are forecasting the value of the company rising by a multiple of 15 in the space of 18 months!

Even in the heyday of this company they never had real sales anywhere near 40 mill. Those days are gone.

A 600% rise in revenue. Levels of income never seen in the company’s history all over the next 18 months. Pearls, do call us when the shuttle lands. In the meantime, lay off the kool aid.

Oops- than 2 weeks prior

Settling into a mid -late 30’s range. Company valuation is now £20m higher on the back of no news. Another opportunity to cut losses at a higher level than 2 weeks o

Pearls, when you show evidence of understanding the bare basics of company balance sheets I’ll debate you. Otherwise, stop posting. It’s embarrassing.

Ravenswell, well said. It feels we have the playground bullies who attempt to silence anyone with an alternative view, even if that alternative view is based on fact , as they stand, rather than sheer optimism.

There is a lack of honesty on this board and no one should feel they cannot post over concerns they will be attacked. People should keep posting as they feel.

I mentioned that, when covering one module, on investment advice sources, the perils (or Pearls) for young and inexperienced investors when researching information on a stock and got absolutely mullered for it. It is important however, that the views of those who post on a public forum continue to be challenged, especially when said views are extremely questionable.